of authority delegated to their captains by the people
were overstepped, the sway of the princes became confessedly
illegal. Illegality carried with it all the consequences
of an evil conscience, all the insecurities of usurped
dominion all the danger from without and from within
to which an arbitrary governor is exposed. In
the fourth class we find the principle of force
still more openly at work. To it may be assigned
those Condottieri who made a prey of cities at their
pleasure. The illustrious Uguccione della Faggiuola,
who neglected to follow up his victory over the Guelfs
at Monte Catini, in order that he might cement his
power in Lucca and Pisa, is an early instance of this
kind of tyrant. His successor, Castruccio Castracane,
the hero of Machiavelli’s romance, is another.
But it was not until the first half of the fifteenth
century that professional Condottieri became powerful
enough to found such kingdoms as that, for example,
of Francesco Sforza at Milan.[3] The fifth
class includes the nephews or sons of Popes. The
Riario principality of Forli, the Della Rovere of Urbino,
the Borgia of Romagna, the Farnese of Parma, form
a distinct species of despotisms; but all these are
of a comparatively late origin. Until the Papacies
of Sixtus IV. and Innocent VIII. the Popes had not
bethought them of providing in this way for their
relatives. Also, it may be remarked, there was
an essential weakness in these tyrannies. Since
they had to be carved out of the States of the Church,
the Pope who had established his son, say in Romagna,
died before he could see him well confirmed in a province
which the next Pope sought to wrest from his hands,
in order to bestow it on his own favorite. The
fabric of the Church could not long have stood this
disgraceful wrangling between Papal families for the
dynastic possession of Church property. Luckily
for the continuance of the Papacy, the tide of counter-reformation
which set in after the sack of Rome and the great
Northern Schism, put a stop to nepotism in its most
barefaced form.
[1] This classification must
of necessity be imperfect, since many
of the tyrannies belong in
part to two or more of the kinds which I
have mentioned.
[2] See Guicc. Ist. end of Book 4.
[3] John Hawkwood (died 1393), the English adventurer, held Cotignola and Bagnacavallo from Gregory XI. In the second half of the fifteenth century the efforts of the Condottieri to erect tyrannies were most frequent. Braccio da Montone established himself in Perugia in 1416, and aspired, not without good grounds for hope, to acquiring the kingdom of Italy. Francesco Sforza, before gaining Milan, had begun to form a despotism at Ancona. Sforza’s rival, Giacomo Piccinino, would probably have succeeded in his own attempt, had not Ferdinand of Aragon treacherously murdered him at Naples in 1465. In the disorganization caused by Charles VIII., Vidovero of Brescia in 1495 established