and the Visconti. The chronicle of the Villani
and the Florentine history of Poggio contain the record
of this strife, which seemed to them the all-important
crisis of Italian affairs. In the Milanese annals
of Galvano Fiamma and Mussi, on the other hand, the
advantages of a despotic sovereignty in giving national
coherence, the crimes of the Papacy, which promoted
anarchy in its ill-governed States, and the prospect
of a comprehensive Italian tyranny under the great
house of the Visconti, are eloquently pleaded.
The terms of the main issue being thus clearly defined,
we may regard the warfare carried on by Bertrand du
Poiet and Louis of Bavaria in the interests of Church
and Empire, the splendid campaigns of Egidio d’Albornoz,
and the delirious cruelty of Robert of Geneva, no
less than the predatory excursions of Charles IV.,
as episodical. The main profits of those convulsions,
which drowned Italy in blood during nearly all the
fourteenth century, accrued to the Despots, who held
their ground in spite of all attempts to dispossess
them. The greater houses, notably the Visconti,
acquired strength by revolutions in which the Church
and Empire neutralized each other’s action.
The lesser families struck firm roots into cities,
infuriated rather than intimidated by such acts of
violence as the massacres of Faenza and Cesena in 1377.
The relations of the imperial and pontifical parties
were confused; while even in the center of republican
independence, at Florence, social changes, determined
in great measure by the exhaustion of the city in its
conflict, prepared the way for the Medicean tyranny.
Neither the Church nor the Empire gained steady footing
in Italy, while the prestige of both was ruined.[1]
Municipal freedom, instead of being enlarged, was
extinguished by the ambition of the Florentine oligarchs,
who, while they spent the last florin of the Commune
in opposing the Visconti, never missed an opportunity
of enslaving the sister burghs of Tuscany. In
a word, the destiny of the nation was irresistibly
impelling it toward despotism.
[1] Machiavelli, in his Istorie Fiorentine (Firenze, 1818, vol. i. pp. 47, 48), points out how the competition of the Church and Empire, during the Papacies of Benedict XII. and Clement VI. and the reign of Louis strengthened the tyrants of Lombardy, Romagna, and the March. Each of the two contending powers gave away what did not belong to them, bidding against each other for any support they might obtain from the masters of the towns.
In order to explain the continual prosperity of the princes amid the clash of forces brought to bear against them from so many sides, we must remember that they were the partisans of social order in distracted burghs, the heroes of the middle classes and the multitude, the quellers of faction, the administrators of impartial laws, and the aggrandizers of the city at the expense of its neighbors. Ser Gorello, singing the praises of the Bishop Guido dei Tarlati di Pietra Mala, who