[1] The history of Florence
illustrates more clearly than that of
any other town the vast importance
acquired by trades and guilds in
politics at this epoch of
the civil wars.
[2] This is the sting of Cacciaguida’s
scornful lamentation over
Florence Par. xvi.
Ma
la cittadinanza, ch’ e or mista
Di Campi e di
Certaldo e di Figghine,
Pura vedeasi nell’
ultimo artista.
Tal
fatto e fiorentino, e cambia e merca,
Che si sarebbe
volto a Semifonti,
La dove andava
l’ avolo alia cerca.
Sempre
la confusione delle persone
Principio fu del
mal della cittade,
Come del corpo
il cibo che s’ appone.
So deep and dreadful was the discord, so utter the exhaustion, that the distracted Communes were fain at last to find some peace in tyranny. At the close of their long quarrel with the house of Hohenstauffen, the Popes called Charles of Anjou into Italy. The final issue of that policy for the nation at large will be discussed in another portion of this work. It is enough to point out here that, as Ezzelino da Romano introduced despotism in its worst form as a party leader of the Ghibellines, so Charles of Anjou became a typical tyrant in the Guelf interest. He was recognized as chief of the Guelf party by the Florentines, and the kingdom of the Two Sicilies was conferred upon him as the price of his dictatorship. The republics almost simultaneously entered upon a new phase. Democratized by the extension of the franchise, corrupted, to use Machiavelli’s phrase, in their old organization of the Popolo and Commune, they fell into the hands of tyrants, who employed the prestige of their party, the indifference of the Vigliacchi, and the peace-loving instincts of the middle class for the consolidation of their selfish autocracy.[1] Placing himself above the law, manipulating the machinery