conceived a confederation. The thirst for autonomy
in each state was as great as of old among the cities
of Greece. To be independent of a sister republic,
though such freedom were bought at the price of the
tyranny of a native family was the first object of
every commonwealth. At the same time this passion
for independence was only equaled by the greed of
foreign usurpation. The second object of each
republic was to extend its power at the expense of
its neighbors. As Pisa swallowed Amalfi, so Genoa
destroyed Pisa, and Venice did her best to cripple
Genoa. Florence obliterated the rival burgh of
Semifonte, and Milan twice reduced Piacenza to a wilderness.
The notion that the great maritime powers of Italy
or the leading cities of Lombardy should permanently
co-operate for a common purpose was never for a moment
entertained. Such leagues as were formed were
understood to be temporary. When their immediate
object had been gained, the members returned to their
initial rivalries. Milan, when, on the occasion
of Filippo Maria Visconti’s death, she had a
chance of freedom, refused to recognize the liberties
of the Lombard cities, and fell a prey to Francesco
Sforza. Florence, under the pernicious policy
of Cosimo de’ Medici, helped to enslave Milan
and Bologna instead of entering into a republican
league against their common foes, the tyrants.
Pisa, Arezzo, and the other subject cities of Tuscany
were treated by her with such selfish harshness that
they proved her chiefest peril in the hour of need.[1]
Competition in commerce increased the mutual hatred
of the free burghs. States like Venice, Florence,
Pisa, Genoa, depending for their existence upon mercantile
wealth, and governed by men of business, took every
opportunity they could of ruining a rival in the market.
So mean and narrow was the spirit of Italian policy
that no one accounted it unpatriotic or dishonorable
for Florence to suck the very life out of Pisa, or
for Venice to strangle a competitor so dangerous as
Genoa.
[1] See the instructions furnished
to Averardo dei Medici, quoted by
Von Reumont in his Life
of Lorenzo, vol. ii. p. 122, German
edition.
Thus the jealousy of state against state, of party
against party, and of family against family, held
Italy in perpetual disunion; while diplomatic habits
were contracted which rendered the adoption of any
simple policy impossible. When the time came for
the Italians to cope with the great nations of Europe,
the republics of Venice, Genoa, Milan, Florence ought
to have been leagued together and supported by the
weight of the Papal authority. They might then
have stood against the world. Instead of that,
these cities presented nothing but mutual rancors,
hostilities, and jealousies to the common enemy.
Moreover, the Italians were so used to petty intrigues
and to a system of balance of power within the peninsula,
that they could not comprehend the magnitude of the
impending danger. It was difficult for a politician