The bill for the organization of the Territories of Nebraska and Kansas being under consideration—­Mr. Chase submitted the following amendment: 

Strike out from section 14 the words “was superseded by the principles of the legislation of 1850, commonly called the compromise measures, and; so that the clause will read: 

“That the Constitution, and all laws of the United States which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the same force and effect within the said Territory of Nebraska as elsewhere within the United States, except the eighth section of the act preparatory to the admission of Missouri into the Union, approved March 6, 1820, which is hereby declared inoperative.”

Mr. Chase said: 

Mr. President, I had occasion, a few days ago to expose the utter groundlessness of the personal charges made by the Senator from Illinois (Mr. Douglas) against myself and the other signers of the Independent Democratic Appeal.  I now move to strike from this bill a statement which I will to-day demonstrate to be without any foundation in fact or history.  I intend afterward to move to strike out the whole clause annulling the Missouri prohibition.

I enter into this debate, Mr. President, in no spirit of personal unkindness.  The issue is too grave and too momentous for the indulgence of such feelings.  I see the great question before me, and that question only.

Sir, these crowded galleries, these thronged lobbies, this full attendance of the Senate, prove the deep, transcendent interest of the theme.

A few days only have elapsed since the Congress of the United States assembled in this Capitol.  Then no agitation seemed to disturb the political elements.  Two of the great political parties of the country, in their national conventions, had announced that slavery agitation was at an end, and that henceforth that subject was not to be discussed in Congress or out of Congress.  The President, in his annual message, had referred to this state of opinion, and had declared his fixed purpose to maintain, as far as any responsibility attached to him, the quiet of the country.  Let me read a brief extract from that message: 

“It is no part of my purpose to give prominence to any subject which may properly be regarded as set at rest by the deliberate judgment of the people.  But while the present is bright with promise, and the future full of demand and inducement for the exercise of active intelligence, the past can never be without useful lessons of admonition and instruction.  If its dangers serve not as beacons, they will evidently fail to fulfil the object of a wise design.  When the grave shall have closed over all those who are now endeavoring to meet the obligations of duty, the year 1850 will be recurred to as a period filled with anxious apprehension.  A successful war had just terminated.  Peace brought with it a vast augmentation of territory.  Disturbing questions arose, bearing