activity and energy. Was this all too brief period
to be filled up with a senile renewal of sexual longing!
He felt ashamed of the thoughts that had occupied
so much of his mind since he had laid David Williams
on the couch of his library, to find it was Vivie
Warren whose arms were round his neck. He was
not sorry this love for a woman he could not possess
had sent him into Parliament. He was beginning
to enjoy himself there. He had found himself,
had lost that craven fear of the Speaker that paralyzes
most new members. He knew when to speak and when
to be silent; and when he spoke unsuspected gifts
of biting sarcasm, clever characterization, convincing
scorn of the uneducated minister type came to his aid.
His tongue played round his victims, unequipped as
they were with his vast experience of reality, vaguely
discursive, on the surface as are most lawyers, at
a loss for similes and tropes as are most men of business,
or dull of wits as are most of the fine flowers of
the public schools, stultified with the classics and
scripture history. He knew that unless there
was some radical change of government he could not
be a minister; but he cared little for that.
He was rich—thanks to his wife—he
was recovering his influence and his European and
American reputation as a great discoverer, a deep
thinker. He enjoyed pulverizing the Ministry over
their suffrage insincerities and displaying his contempt
of the politician elected only for his money influence
in borough, county, or in the subscription lists of
the Chief Whip. Though his pulses still beat a
little quicker when he held Vivie’s hand in his
at some reception of Lady Feenix’s or a dinner
party at the Gorings—Vivie as the child
of a “fallen” woman had a prescriptive
right of entrance to Diana’s circle—he
had not the slightest intention of running away with
her, of nipping his career in two, just as he might
be scaling the last heights to the citadel of fame:
either as a politician of the new type, the type of
high education, or as one of the giants of inductive
science. Besides in 1912, if I mistake not, Dr.
Smith-Woodward and Mr. Charles Dawson made that discovery
of the remains of an ape-like man in the gravels of
mid-Sussex; and the hounds of Anthropology went off
on a new scent at full cry, Rossiter foremost in the
pack.
Mrs. Rossiter in the same year allowed herself more and more to be tempted into anti-suffrage discussions at the houses of peers or of strong-minded, influential ladies who were on the easiest terms with peers and potentates. She still resented the line her husband had taken in politics and believed it to be chiefly due to an inexplicable interest in Vivien Warren who she began to feel was the same person as “David Williams.”