poet and the noblest genius of any that have left
writings behind them."[67] Such were the words of a
man of genius, who was acquainted with the works of
Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Spenser. While all
admirers of Sidney must regret a praise of his literary
abilities so exaggerated and mistaken, the eulogies
which have been lavished upon his personal character
have never been thought to surpass the worth of their
object. Sir Philip Sidney, in the short life
allotted to him, had added to his personal beauty and
amiable disposition all that was most fitted to win
the admiration of his time. His rare accomplishments,
his chivalrous manners and unusual powers of conversation
made him so great a favorite at court, that it was
the pride of Elizabeth to call him “her Philip.”
A considerable knowledge of military affairs, and
a fearless gallantry in battle, combined, with Sidney’s
genial disposition, to win for him the universal affection
of the army. The violence of the Middle Ages
lingers in Sir Philip’s angry words to his father’s
secretary: “Mr. Molyneux, if ever I know
you to do so much as read any letter I write to my
father, without his commandment or my consent, I will
thrust my dagger into you. And trust to it, for
I speak it in earnest.” But the spirit of
generosity and self-sacrifice, which we are also accustomed
to associate with mediaeval knighthood, was realized
in the famous scene on the battle-field before Zutphen.
With good natural talents and an untiring industry,
Sir Philip acquired a knowledge of science, of languages,
and of literature, which gave him a reputation abroad
as well as at home. The learned Languet relinquished
his regular duties without prospect of pecuniary reward
“to be a nurse of knowledge to this hopeful young
gentleman."[68] The regrets of the universities at
Sidney’s death filled three volumes with academic
eulogies. But a better testimony than these volumes
to the general admiration for Sidney’s talents,
and to his position as a patron of literature, is
to be found in the beautiful lines in which Spenser
lamented his benefactor, and in two sentences by poor
Tom Nash[69], who knew but too well the value of what
he and his fellow-laborers had lost: “Gentle
Sir Philip Sidney, thou knewest what belonged to a
scholar; thou knewest what pains, what toil, what
travel conduct to perfection; well could’st thou
give every virtue his encouragement, every art his
due, every writer his desert, cause none more virtuous,
witty, or learned than thyself. But thou art dead
in thy grave, and has left too few successors of thy
glory, too few to cherish the sons of the Muses, or
water those budding hopes with their plenty, which
thy bounty erst planted.” The public manifestations
of grief at Sidney’s death, and the rivalry
of two nations for the possession of his remains,
seem to have proceeded rather from the fame of his
personal virtues than from the accomplishment of great
achievements. It was recorded on the tomb of the
learned Dr. Thornton that he had been “the tutor
of Sir Philip Sidney,” and Lord Brooke caused
the inscription to be placed over his own grave:
“Fulke Greville, servant to Queen Elizabeth,
counsellor to King James, and friend to Sir Philip
Sidney.”