will bringe me forwarde to my haven."[58] This is
a moderate specimen of the ornate and exaggerated
language which was following the new acquisitions of
learning and intelligence, just as extravagance in
dress and food was following the new prosperity and
wealth. Men wished to crowd their learning and
cultivation into every thing they said or wrote.
As the language was not yet settled by good prose
writers, the more affected a style, the more numerous
its similes, and far-fetched its allusions, the more
ingenious and admirable it was considered to be.
There resulted a sacrifice of clearness and simplicity
to a strained elegance. Still, in the Euphuistic
style, tedious and grotesque as it often is, appear
the first serious efforts, among English prose writers,
to attain a better mode of expression. The results
which followed the absence of a standard written language
at home were strengthened by the general acquaintance
with foreign literature. Italy in the sixteenth
century was the leading intellectual nation, and the
example of the refined and over-polished manner of
writing there prevalent had much to do with the growth
in England of a fondness for affected mannerisms and
fancied ornaments of language. The new ideas
in regard to poetry and versification which Wyat and
Surrey had brought from Italy, were but the beginning
of an extensive Italian influence. It was not
without reason that Ascham inveighed against “the
enchantments of Circe brought out of Italy to mar
men’s manners in England.” Italian
works were translated and circulated in great numbers
in England, and among these the most popular were
the gay and amorous productions of the story tellers.[59]
Born in Kent in 1554, John Lyly studied at Magdalen
College, Oxford, and received the degree of Master
of Arts. Not a very diligent scholar, he disliked
the “crabbed studies” of logic and philosophy,
“his genie being naturally bent to the pleasant
paths of poetry,” but he was reputed at the
University as afterward at Elizabeth’s court,
“a rare poet, witty, comical, and facetious.”
During his life in London he produced a number of
plays and poems which have given his name a not inconsiderable
place in the list of Elizabethan poets and dramatists.
He is now best known, where known at all, by his prose
work “Euphues,” which was so much admired
at Elizabeth’s court, that all the ladies knew
his phrases by heart, and to “parley Euphuism”
was a sign of breeding. For many years Lyly lingered
about the court waiting for a promised position to
reward his labors and support his declining years.
But in vain. “A thousand hopes,” he
complained, “but all nothing; a hundred promises,
but yet nothing.” Lyly died in 1606, leaving,
as he said, but three legacies; “Patience to
my creditors, Melancholie without measure to my friends,
and Beggarie without shame to my family.”