part of Ireland, and there died, attended by a daughter, the only survivor of twenty-two children, who remembered nothing of her father “previous to his retirement from the world; and knew little of him, save that he bore the infirmities and misfortunes of his declining years with the heroism of true Christianity, and that he was possessed of virtues and feelings which shone forth to the last moment of his life, unimpaired by the distractions of pain, and unshaken amid the ruins of genius."[194]

The “Fool of Quality” was first published in 1766, and received a moderate share of public attention.  Its narrative was extremely slight.  Harry, the future Earl of Moreland, was stolen from his parents by an uncle in disguise; and the five volumes of the work consist almost entirely of an account of the education of the child, and the various incidents which affected or illustrated his mental growth.  One day John Wesley chanced to meet with it, and although he required his followers “to read only such books as tend to the knowledge and love of God,” he was tempted to look into this particular novel.  The “whimsical title” at first offended him, but as he proceeded, he became so enthusiastic over the moral excellence of the work, that he expunged some offensive passages it contained, and republished it for the benefit of the Methodists.  “I now venture to recommend the following treatise,” said Wesley to his people, “as the most excellent in its kind that I have seen either in the English or any other language. * * * It perpetually aims at inspiring and increasing every right affection; at the instilling gratitude to God and benevolence to man.  And it does this not by dry, dull, tedious, precepts, but by the liveliest examples that can be conceived; by setting before your eyes one of the most beautiful pictures that ever was drawn in the world.  The strokes of this are so delicately fine, the touches so easy, natural, and affecting, that I know not who can survey it with tearless eyes, unless he has a heart of stone.  I recommend it, therefore, to all those who are already, or who desire to be, lovers of God and man.”  It was not as a good novel that Wesley either enjoyed or republished the “Fool of Quality.”  He recommended it for the excellence of its moral, and the “Fool of Quality” would have been allowed to slumber forever on Methodist book-shelves, had it not been revived by a man who was an equally good judge of a moral and a work of fiction.

But, in regard to this novel, it must be admitted that Charles Kingsley’s judgment was seriously at fault.  He saw both its qualities and its faults, but he did not realize that a good purpose will not make up for a poor execution.  The causes of the neglect of the book, said the Canon in his preface, are to be found “in its deep and grand ethics, in its broad and genial humanity, in the divine value which it attaches to the relations of husband and wife, father and child, and to the utter absence,