Sec.6.  The word municipal was used by the Romans to designate that which related to a municipium, which was a free town, or city.  The rights of a citizen of such free city or town were called municipal rights, and its officers were called municipal officers.  In this country, the word is not only used in this limited sense, but is extended to what pertains to a state.  Hence the body of laws which prescribe the duties of the citizens of a state, are called the municipal or civil law.  And the term is used to distinguish the laws made by the legislature, or law-making power of the state, from the constitution, or political law, adopted by the people in their political capacity.

Sec.7.  If, as has been said, the laws of the Creator form a perfect rule of conduct for all mankind, and ought in all cases to be obeyed, then all human law ought to agree with the divine law.  If a human law is contrary to the divine law, or if it requires us to disobey the commands of God, it is not binding, and should not be obeyed.  So the Scriptures teach.  They speak approvingly of men who disobeyed human authority, and who gave as the reason, that it was their duty to obey God rather than men; and they furnish many examples of good men who submitted to severe punishment, even to death, rather than do what they knew to be contrary to the divine will.

Sec.8.  But although the divine will as revealed in the Scriptures, is a perfect rule or law for all mankind, and although human laws ought to conform to the divine law, yet it would be impossible to govern the people of a state by that law alone.  The divine law is broad, and comprehends rules to teach men their whole duty; but it does not specify every particular act of duty.  Much of it consists of general principles to which particular acts must be made to conform.  It requires men to deal justly with each other; but men do not always agree as to what is right.  Human laws, therefore, become necessary to declare what shall be considered just and right between man and man.

Sec.9.  It may be observed, further, that all the divine precepts could not be carried into effect in civil government.  They are spiritual, and reach to the thoughts and intents of the heart.  They require us to love our Creator supremely, and our neighbor as ourselves; in other words, to do to others as we would that they should do to us.  But as the omniscient God only knows when men fail in these duties, no human authority could enforce such a law.  Human laws, therefore, have respect chiefly to the outward acts of men, and are designed to regulate their intercourse with each other.

Sec.10.  Although the laws of the state can not compel men to fulfill the great law of love, it is nevertheless morally binding upon all.  A perfectly holy Creator could consistently require of his moral and accountable creatures nothing less than supreme love to himself, and equal love to one another.  This, as has been remarked, is in accordance with the law of nature, which is right in the nature of things. (Chap.  III.  Sec.2, 3.)