That independence for children is the general aim of the world, I know well.  But I know also, in reply to this objection, that Christianity has no such word as independence in her book.  For of what do people wish to make their children independent?  Certainly not of Providence, for that would be insanity indeed.  Of the poor then shall I say?  That is impossible, for how could they get their daily bread?  Of the rich, then, like themselves?  That would be folly, for where would they form their friendships or their connubial connections, in which they must place a portion of the happiness of their lives?  Do they wish then to make them independent of society at large, so as not to do it good?  That is against all religion.  In short it is impossible, while we exist in this life, to be independent one of another.  We are bound by Christianity in one great chain, every link of which is to support the next; or the band is broken.  But if they mean by independence such a moneyed situation as shall place their children out of the reach of the frowns, and crosses, and vicissitudes of the world, so that no thought or care shall be necessary for the means of their own livelihood, I fear they are procuring a situation for them, which will be injurious even to their temporal interests as men.

The matter then seems to me to be brought to this question, whether it is better, I mean as a general proposition, to bring up children with the expectation of such a moderate portion of wealth, that they shall see the necessity of relying upon their own honest endeavours and the Divine support, or to bring them up with such notions of independence, that, in the pride and exultation of their hearts, they may be induced to count themselves mighty, and to lose sight of the power and providence of God?

If we were to look into the world for an answer to this question, we should find no greater calamity than that of leaving to children an affluent independence.  Such persons, when grown up, instead of becoming a blessing, are generally less useful than others.  They are frequently proud and haughty, fancying themselves omnipotent, they bid defiance to the opinions of the virtuous part of the community.  To the laws of honour and fashion they pay a precise obedience, but trample under foot, as of little consequence, the precepts of the Christian religion.  Having sensual gratifications in their power, they indulge to excess.  By degrees they ruin their health and fortunes, and get wisdom by experience, when it is too late to use it.  How many young persons have I known, and I wish I could make a different statement, whose ruin originated wholly in a sense of their own independence of the world!