office; owing to which cause, and perhaps also to a
little (or not a little) mutual shyness, I for some
years came so seldom into contact with Mr. Mill, that,
though he of course knew me by sight, we scarcely
ever spoke, and generally passed each other without
any mark of recognition when we happened to meet in
or out of doors. Early in 1846, however, I sent
him a copy of a book I had just brought out, on “Over-population.”
A day or two afterwards he came into my room to thank
me for it; and during the half-hour’s conversation
that thereupon ensued, sprang up, full grown at its
birth, an intimate friendship, of which I feel that
I am not unduly boasting in declaring it to have been
equally sincere and fervent on both sides. From
that time for the next ten or twelve years, a day
seldom passed without, if I did not go into his room,
his coming into mine, often telling me as he entered,
that he had nothing particular to say; but that, having
a few minutes to spare, he thought we might as well
have a little talk. And what talks we have had
on such occasions, and on what various subjects! and
not unfrequently, too, when the room was Mill’s,
Grote, the historian, would join us, first announcing
his advent by a peculiar and ever-welcome rat-tat
with his walking-stick on the door. I must not
dwell longer over these recollections; but there are
two special obligations of my own to Mill which I
cannot permit myself to pass over. When, in 1856,
he became examiner, he had made it, as I have been
since assured by the then chairman of the East-India
Company, a condition of his acceptance of the post,
that I, whose name very likely the Chairman had never
before heard, should be associated with him as one
of his assistant examiners; and I was placed, in consequence,
in charge of the Public-Works Department. Not
long afterwards, having lapsed into a state of nervous
weakness, which for nearly a year absolutely incapacitated
me for mental labor, I should, but for Mill, have
been compelled to retire from the service. From
this, however, he saved me by quietly taking upon himself,
and for the space of twelve months discharging, the
whole of my official duties, in addition to his own.
Is it wonderful that such a man, supposed by those
who did not know him to be cold, stern, and dry, should
have been enthusiastically beloved by those who did?
It is little to say, that my own friendship with him was, from first to last, never once ruffled by difference or misunderstanding of any kind. Differences of opinion we had in abundance; but my open avowal of them was always recognized by him as one of the strongest proofs of respect, and served to cement instead of weakening our attachment.[1] The nearest approach made throughout our intercourse to any thing of an unpleasant character was about the time of his retirement from the India House. Talking over that one day with two or three of my colleagues, I said it would not do to let Mill go without receiving