had no right to interfere with a “chivalrous southern gentleman,” while passing through Philadelphia with his slaves.  Thus, to make an effective blow, all the pro-slavery elements of Philadelphia were brought into action, and matters looked for a time as though Slavery in this instance would have everything its own way.  Passmore was locked up in prison on the flimsy pretext of contempt of court, and true bills were found against him and half a dozen colored men, charging them with “riot,” “forcible abduction,” and “assault and battery,” and there was no lack of hard swearing on the part of Col.  Wheeler and his pro-slavery sympathizers in substantiation of these grave charges.  But the pro-slaveryites had counted without their host—­Passmore would not yield an inch, but stood as firmly by his principles in prison, as he did on the boat.  Indeed, it was soon evident, that his resolute course was bringing floods of sympathy from the ablest and best minds throughout the North.  On the other hand, the occasion was rapidly awakening thousands daily, who had hitherto manifested little or no interest at all on the subject, to the wrongs of the slave.

It was soon discovered by the “chivalry” that keeping Mr. Williamson in prison would indirectly greatly aid the cause of Freedom—­that every day he remained would make numerous converts to the cause of liberty; that Mr. Williamson was doing ten-fold more in prison for the cause of universal liberty than he could possibly do while pursuing his ordinary vocation.

With regard to the colored men under bonds, Col.  Wheeler and his satellites felt very confident that there was no room for them to escape.  They must have had reason so to think, judging from the hard swearing they did, before the committing magistrate.  Consequently, in the order of events, while Passmore was still in prison, receiving visits from hosts of friends, and letters of sympathy from all parts of the North, William Still, William Curtis, James P. Braddock, John Ballard, James Martin and Isaiah Moore, were brought into court for trial.  The first name on the list in the proceedings of the court was called up first.

Against this individual, it was pretty well understood by the friends of the slave, that no lack of pains and false swearing would be resorted to on the part of Wheeler and his witnesses, to gain a verdict.

Mr. McKim and other noted abolitionists managing the defense, were equally alive to the importance of overwhelming the enemy in this particular issue.  The Hon. Charles Gibbons, was engaged to defend William Still, and William S. Pierce, Esq., and William B. Birney, Esq., the other five colored defendants.

In order to make the victory complete, the anti-slavery friends deemed it of the highest importance to have Jane Johnson in court, to face her master, and under oath to sweep away his “refuge of lies,” with regard to her being “abducted,” and her unwillingness to “leave her master,” etc.  So Mr. McKim and the friends very privately arranged to have Jane Johnson on hand at the opening of the defense.