were invited into it and accompanied by the writer, who procured it, were driven down town, and on Tenth Street, below Lombard, the inmates were invited out of it, and the said conductor paid the driver and discharged him.  For prudential reasons he took them to a temporary resting-place, where they could tarry until after dark; then they were invited to his own residence, where they were made welcome, and in due time forwarded East.  Now, what disposition was made of them after they had left the wharf, while Williamson and Wheeler were discussing matters—­(as was clearly sworn to by Passmore, in his answer to the writ of Habeas Corpus)—­he Williamson did not know.  That evening, before seeing the member of the Committee, with whom he acted in concert on the boat, and who had entire charge of Jane and her boys, he left for Harrisburg, to fulfill business engagements.  The next morning his father (Thomas Williamson) brought the writ of Habeas Corpus (which had been served at Passmore’s office after he left) to the Anti-Slavery Office.  In his calm manner he handed it to the writer, at the same time remarking that “Passmore had gone to Harrisburg,” and added, “thee had better attend to it” (the writ).  Edward Hopper, Esq., was applied to with the writ, and in the absence of Mr. Williamson, appeared before the court, and stated “that the writ had not been served, as Mr. W. was out of town,” etc.

After this statement, the Judge postponed further action until the next day.  In the meanwhile, Mr. Williamson returned and found the writ awaiting him, and an agitated state of feeling throughout the city besides.  Now it is very certain, that he did not seek to know from those in the secret, where Jane Johnson and her boys were taken after they left the wharf, or as to what disposition had been made of them, in any way; except to ask simply, “are they safe?” (and when told “yes,” he smiled) consequently, he might have been examined for a week, by the most skillful lawyer, at the Philadelphia bar, but he could not have answered other than he did in making his return to the writ, before Judge Kane, namely:  “That the persons named in the writ, nor either of them, are now nor was at the time of issuing of the writ, or the original writ, or at any other time in the custody, power, or possession of the respondent, nor by him confined or restrained; wherefore he cannot have the bodies,” etc..

Thus, while Mr. W. was subjected to the severest trial of his devotion to Freedom, his noble bearing throughout, won for him the admiration and sympathy of the friends of humanity and liberty throughout the entire land, and in proof of his fidelity, he most cheerfully submitted to imprisonment rather than desert his principles.  But the truth was not wanted in this instance by the enemies of Freedom; obedience to Slavery was demanded to satisfy the South.  The opportunity seemed favorable for teaching abolitionists and negroes, that they