nigh: but he knew and felt it, with more
composure than his friends could summon.
It might well be said of this our beloved patriarch,
that his eye was not dim, nor his natural force
abated. To the last of his daily journeyings
through the city, for which he generally used
the rail road, he would never allow the drivers to
stop for him to get on or off the car, feeling, as
he used smilingly to observe, ‘very jealous
on that point.’ Few ever passed him
in the street without asking who he was; for not only
did his primitive dress, his broad-brimmed hat,
and his antique shoe buckles attract attention,
but the beauty and benevolence of his face was
sure to fix the eye of ordinary discernment. He
was a living temperance lecture, and those who
desire to preserve good looks could not ask a
more infallible receipt, than that sweet temper
and out-flowing benevolence which made his countenance
please every eye. Gay and cheerful as a boy, he
had ever some pleasant anecdote or amusing turn
to relate, and in all perhaps not one without
a moral bearing, not thrust forward, but left
to be picked out by the hearer at his leisure.
He seemed born to show how great strictness in
essentials could exist without the least asceticism
in trifles. Anything but a Simeon Stylites
in his sainthood, he could go among ’publicans
and sinners’ without the least fear of being
mistaken by them for one of themselves. An
influence radiated from him that made itself felt
in every company, though he would very likely be the
most modest man present. More gentlemanly
manners and address no court in Christendom need
require; his resolute simplicity and candor, always
under the guidance of a delicate taste, never for
a moment degenerated into coarseness or disregard
even of the prejudices of others. His life,
even in these minute particulars, showed how the
whole man is harmonized by the sense of being
‘Ever in the Great Taskmaster’s eye.’
“He died on the 7th
of May, 1852, in his eighty-first year, and
a public funeral in the Tabernacle
brought together thousands
desirous of showing respect
to his memory.”
Mrs. Child has written a full, and in many respects, an exceedingly interesting biography of the subject of this memoir, towards the close of which she says:
“From the numerous notices
in papers of all parties and sects, I
will merely quote the following.
‘The New York Observer’ thus
announces his death:
“’The venerable Isaac T. Hopper, whose placid, benevolent face has so long irradiated almost every public meeting for doing good, and whose name, influence, and labors, have been devoted with an apostolic simplicity and constancy to humanity, died on Friday last, at an advanced age. He was a Quaker of that early sort illustrated by such philanthropists as Anthony Benezet, Thomas Clarkson, Mrs. Fry, and the like.
“’He was a most self-denying,