This action against the zealots was in all probability taken, if not at the instigation of the Moslem authorities, yet in close concert with them.  Eulogius[1] attributes all the evils which had befallen the Church, such as the imprisonment of bishops, priests, abbots, and deacons, to the wrath of the King; and Alvar distinctly states that the King was urged, even bribed, to take measures against the Christians.[2] It is not likely that the King required much persuading.  Mohammed at least seems to have been thoroughly frightened by the continued agitation against Mohammedanism.  He naturally suspected some political plot at the bottom of it; a supposition which receives some countenance from the various references in Eulogius[3] to the martyrs as “Soldiers of God” bound to war against His Moslem enemies; and from the undoubted fact that the Christians of Toledo did rise in favour of their coreligionists at Cordova.[4] However that may be, the King in 852 certainly took counsel[5] with his ministers, how the agitation should be met, and he seems to have assembled a sort of grand council[6] of the Church, when the same question was discussed.  Stronger measures were in consequence taken, and a more rigorous imprisonment resorted to.  But Mohammed went farther than this.  He deprived of their posts all Christians, who held offices in the palace,[7] or in connection with the Court, and withdrew from the Christian “cadet corps,"[8] the royal bounty usually extended to them.  He ordered the destruction of all churches built since the conquest, and of all later additions to those previously existing.  He made a severe enactment against those who reviled Mohammed.[9] He even had in mind to banish all Christians from his dominions.[10] This intention, together with the order respecting the churches, was not carried out, owing probably to the opportune revolt at Toledo.[11]

    [1] Ep. ad Wilies, sec. 10.

    [2] Alvar, “Ind.  Lum.,” sec. 35.

    [3] See Dozy, ii. 136.

    [4] Conde, i. 249:  Dozy, ii. 161, says on Eulogius’ authority,
    that he incited them to revolt under Sindila.

    [5] Eulog., “Mem.  Sanct.,” ii. c. xiv.

    [6] Robertson calls it a Conciliabulum.

    [7] Eulog., “Mem.  Sanct.,” ii.  Sec. 2.

    [8] “Militares pueros.”  Eulog.  “Mem.  Sanct.,” iii. c. i.

[9] Eulog.  “Mem.  Sanct.,” ii. c. xiv—­“Tunc iam procul dubio enecandi nos difficultas fuit adempta, si quisquam vatis sui temerarius exprobator ultro occurreret.”  This seems to mean that Christians and Saracens were bound to give up to justice any who reviled the Prophet; or else to kill him on the spot.

    [10] Eulog., “Doc.  Mart.,” sec. 18—­“Moslemi ... omne regni
    sui, sicuti cernitis, genus excludere moliuntur
    Christicolarum.”

    [11] Eulog., “Mem.  Sanct.,” iii. c. iv.