[1] Dunham, ii. p. 121, note.

[2] Dozy, ii. p. 41, note, quotes Ermold Nigel on Barcelona: 

“Urbs erat interea Francorum inhospita turnis,
Maurorum votis adsociata magis.”

To the down-trodden slaves, who were very numerous all through Spain, the Moslems came in the character of deliverers.  A slave had only to pronounce the simple formula:  “There is no God but God, and Mohammed is his Prophet”:  and he was immediately free.  To the Jews the Moslems brought toleration, nay, even influence and power.  In fact, since the fall of Jerusalem in 588 B.C. the Jews had never enjoyed such independence and influence as in Spain during the domination of the Arabs.  Their genius being thus allowed free scope, they disputed the supremacy in literature and the arts with the Arabs themselves.

Many of the earlier governors of Spain were harsh and even cruel in their administration, but it was to Moslems and Christians alike.[1] Some indeed increased the tribute laid upon the Christians; but it must be remembered that this tribute[2] was in the first instance very light, and therefore an increase was not felt severely as an oppression.  Moreover, there were not wanting some rulers who upheld the cause of the Christians against illegal exactions.  Among these was Abdurrahman al Ghafeki (May-Aug. 721, and 731-732), of whom an Arab writer says:[3] “He did equal justice to Moslem and Christian ... he restored to the Christians such churches as had been taken from them in contravention of the stipulated treaties; but on the other hand he caused all those to be demolished, which had been erected by the connivance of interested governors.”  Similarly of his successor Anbasah ibn Sohaym Alkelbi (721-726), we find it recorded[4] that “he rendered equal justice to every man, making no distinction between Mussulman and Christian, or between Christian and Jew.”  Anbasah was followed by Yahya ibn Salmah (March-Sept. 726), who is described as injudiciously severe, and dreaded for his extreme rigour by Moslems as well as Christians.[5] Isidore says that he made the Arabs give back to the Christians the property unlawfully taken from them.[6] Similar praise is awarded to Okbah ibn ulhejaj Asseluli (734-740).[7] Yet though many of the Ameers of Spain were just and upright men, no permanent policy could be carried out with regard to the relations between Moslems and Christians, while the Ameers were so constantly changing, being sometimes elected by the army, but oftener appointed by the Khalif, or by his lieutenant, the governor of Africa for the time being.  This perpetual shifting of rulers would in itself have been fatal to the settlement of the country, had it not been brought to an end by the election of Abdurrahman ibn Muawiyah as the Khalif of Spain, and the establishment of his dynasty on the throne, in May 756.  But even after this important step was taken, the causes which threatened to make anarchy perpetual, were still at work in Spain.  Chief among these were the feuds of the Arab tribes, and the jealousy between Berbers and Arabs.