of the Lord’s day, and so keep it to his own condemnation.”  Just in the same manner St. Paul tells the Corinthian Jews, that if they observed the ceremonial of the passover, or rather, “as often as they observed it,” they were to observe it worthily, and make it a religious act.  They were not then come together to make merry on the anniversary of the deliverance of their ancestors from Egyptian bondage, but to meet in memorial of Christ’s sufferings and death.  And therefore, if they ate and drank the passover, under its new and high allusions, unworthily, they profaned the ceremony, and were guilty of the body and blood of Christ.

It appears also from the Syriac, and other oriental versions of the New Testament, such as the Arabic and Ethiopic, as if he only permitted the celebration of the spiritualized passover for a time in condescension to the weakness of some of his converts, who were probably from the Jewish synagogue at Corinth.  For in the seventeenth verse of the eleventh chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians, the Syriac runs thus:  [190] “As to that, concerning which I am now instructing you, I commend you not, because you have not gone forward, but you have gone down into matters of less importance.”  “It appears from hence, says Barclay, that, the Apostle was grieved, that such was their condition that he was forced to give them instruction concerning these outward things, and doting upon which they showed that they were not gone forward in the life of Christianity, but rather sticking in the beggarly elements; and therefore the twentieth verse of the same version has it thus:  [191]’When then ye meet together, ye do not do it as it is just ye should in the day of the Lord; ye eat and drink.’  Therefore showing to them, that to meet together to eat and drink outward bread and wine, was not the labour and work of that day of the Lord.”

[Footnote 190:  The Syriac is a very ancient version, and as respectable or of as high authority as any.  Leusden and Schaaf translate the Syriac thus:  “Hoc autem, quod praecipio, non tanquam laudo vos, quia non progressi estis, sed ad id, quod minus est, descendistis.”  Compare this with the English edition.]

[Footnote 191:  Quum igitur congregamini, non sicut justum est die domini nostri, comeditis et bibites.  Leusden et Schaaf lordoni butavorum.]

Upon the whole, in whatever light the Quakers view the subject before us, they cannot persuade themselves that Jesus Christ intended to establish any new ceremonial, distinct from the passover-supper, or which should render null and void, (as it would be the tendency of all ceremonials to do) the supper which he had before commanded at Capernaum.  The only supper which he ever enjoined to Christians, was the latter.  This spiritual supper was to be eternal and universal.  For he was always to be present with those “who would let him in, and they were to sup with him, and he with them.”  It was