In examining this charge, it must certainly be allowed, that though the principle “of no respect of persons” is no where carried to a greater length than in the Quaker Society, yet we may reasonably expect to find a drawback from the full operation of it in a variety of causes.  We are all of us too apt, in the first place, to look up to the rich, but to look down upon the poor.  We are apt to court the good will of the former, when we seem to care very little even whether we offend the latter.  The rich themselves and the middle classes of men respect the rich more than the poor; and the poor show more respect to the rich than to one another.  Hence it is possible; that a poor man may find more reluctance in entering the doors of a rich man to admonish him, than one who is rich to enter the doors of the poor for the same purpose, men, again, though they may be equally good, may not have all the same strength of character.  Some overseers may be more timid than others, and this timidity may operate upon them more in the execution of their duty upon one class of individuals, than upon another.  Hence a rich man may escape for a longer time without admonition, than a poorer member.  But when the ice is once broken; when admonition is once begun; when respectable persons have been called in by overseers or others, those causes, which might be preventive of justice, will decrease; and, if the matter should be carried to a monthly or a quarterly meeting, they will wholly vanish.  For in these courts it is a truth, that those, who are the most irreproachable for their lives, and the most likely of course to decide justly on any occasion, are the most attended to, or carry the most weight, when they speak publicly.  Now these are to be found principally in the low and middle classes, and these, in all societies, contain the greatest number of individuals.  As to the very rich, these are few indeed compared with the rest, and these may be subdivided into two classes for the farther elucidation of the point.  The first will consist of men, who rigidly follow the rules of the society, and are as exemplary as the very best of the members.  The second will consist of those, who we members according to the letter, but not according to the spirit, and who are content with walking in the shadow, that follows the substance of the body.  Those of the first class will do justice, and they will have on equal influence with any.  Those of the second, whatever may be their riches, or whatever they may say, are seldom if ever attended to in the administration of the discipline.

From hence it will appear, that if there be any partiality in the administration of this institution, it will consist principally in this, that a rich man may be suffered in particular cases, to go longer without admonition than a poorer member; but that after admonition has been begun, justice will be impartially administered; and that the charges of a preference, where disowning is concerned, has no solid foundation for its support.