It is astonishing how little even men of acknowledged piety seem to have their minds fixed upon the ideas contained in the mechanical graces they repeat.  I was one afternoon at a friends house, where there happened to be a clergyman of the Scottish church.  He was a man deservedly esteemed for his piety.  The company was large.  Politics had been discussed some time, when the tea-things were introduced.  While the bread and butter were bringing in, the clergyman, who had taken an active part in the discussion, put a question to a gentleman, who was sitting in a corner of the room.  The gentleman began to reply, and was proceeding in his answer, when of a sudden I heard a solemn voice.  Being surprised, I looked round, and found it was the clergyman, who had suddenly started up, and was saying grace.  The solemnity, with which he spoke, occasioned his voice to differ so much from its ordinary tone, that I did not, till I had looked about me, discover who the speaker was.  I think he might be engaged from three or four minutes in the delivery of this grace.  I could not help thinking, during the delivery of it, that I never knew any person say grace like this man.  Nor was I ever so much moved with any grace, or thought I ever saw so dearly the propriety of saying grace, as on this occasion.  But when I found that on the very instant the grace was over politics were resumed; when I found that, no sooner had the last word in the grace been pronounced, than the next, which came from the clergyman himself, began by desiring the gentleman before mentioned to go on with his reply to his own political question, I was so struck with the inconsistency of the thing, that the beauty and solemnity of his grace all vanished.  This sudden transition from politics to grace, and from grace to politics, afforded a proof that artificial sentences might be so frequently repeated, as to fail to re-excite their first impressions, or that certain expressions, which might have constituted devotional acts under devotional feeling, might relapse into heartless forms.

I should not wish, by the relation of this anecdote, to be understood as reflecting in the slightest manner on the practice of the Scottish church.  I know well the general sobriety, diligence, piety and religious example of its ministers.  I mentioned it merely to shew, that even where the religious character of a person was high, his mind, by the frequent repetition of the same forms of expression on the same occasions, might frequently lose sight of the meaning and force of the words as they were uttered, so that he might pronounce them without that spiritual feeling, which can alone constitute a religious exercise.

CHAP.  VII.

Customs at and after meals—­Quakers never drink healths at dinner—­nor toasts after dinner—­the drinking of toasts a heathen custom—­interrupts often the innocence—­and leads to the intoxication of the company—­anecdote of Judge Hale—­Quakers sometimes in embarrassing situations on account of this omission—­Quaker-women seldom retire after dinner, and leave the men drinking—­Quakers a sober people.