The popular charges against Napoleon, by those who are either prejudiced or have failed to inform themselves of his history, are that he must have been a cruel and barbarous husband or he would not have divorced his wife, and that, as a ruler, he thirsted for blood.  Each of these, as well as many other silly things that are said and believed of him, is palpably false.  As a husband, so far as kindness and indulgence goes, he was exemplary.  As a soldier, First Consul, and Emperor, his desire at all times was for peace.  History has revealed the real man, and in recent years it has been convincingly proved that he was the very antithesis of the monster he has been given out and supposed to be.  Now, in the light of more accurate knowledge and calmer judgment, the world is showing a desire to do him the justice he never ceased to believe that it would do him.

His unexampled personality and fame is spreading and inspiring everywhere.  His faults are being put in the limelight of public opinion, and the growing desire to treat even these with proper generosity is an indication that reason and knowledge are taking the place of stereotyped international prejudice, political and personal.  We are beginning to see more clearly through the fog of enmity that he had rare virtues, besides having unparalleled genius.  The divorce of Josephine was unquestionably political, though had he been the ferocious creature he has been made to appear, the opportunities she gave him so frequently would have justified the divorce at a much earlier stage on other than political grounds.

It ill becomes a nation which knew George I., George IV., and Henry VIII. to take such unctuous exception to the gentle and benevolent attitude of Napoleon before and after the annulment of the marriage.

FOOTNOTES: 

[31] It has been asserted that when Josephine found the divorce to be inevitable she herself suggested the alliance with Marie Louise.  One reason for believing that this might be the case lies in the fact that the affection of Josephine’s children for Napoleon suffered no diminution on account of the divorce—­indeed, Eugene took a leading part in the negotiations for the marriage.

[32] In the notorious “Letters from the Cape,” addressed to Lady Clavering and variously attributed to an Englishman, Las Cases, and even Napoleon himself, there is noted a curious coincidence with regard to the two Franco-Austrian alliances.  Both marriage contracts were signed under somewhat similar circumstances, and in both cases fetes were held in honour of the event.  At the marriage fete of Louis XVI. and Marie Antoinette a calamity occurred which resulted in the loss of about two thousand lives.  To celebrate the union of Napoleon and Marie Louise, Prince Schwartzenberg gave a fete, at which a fire occurred, the Prince’s wife and some twenty other people being burnt to death.  The superstitious drew attention to the coincidence, and it is said that Napoleon looked upon it as an evil omen.