In a letter to her he said:  “I have placed in my will a bequest to you, the only person to whose care I would willingly entrust them, that at my death the manuscripts and plates of this work are to be your absolute property.  I sincerely desire and faintly hope that you may derive some pecuniary benefit from them.”]

[Footnote 23:  Three years before Mr. Greeley had written to the suffrage convention at Cleveland:  “I recognize most thoroughly the right of woman to choose her own sphere of activity and usefulness If she sees fit to navigate vessels, print newspapers, frame laws and select her rulers, I know no principle that justifies man in placing any impediment to her doing so.”  The letter used above shows, however, that not even so great a paper as the Tribune could endure the misrepresentation heaped upon every one who advocated the unpopular doctrine of woman’s rights.]

CHAPTER X.

CAMPAIGNING WITH THE GARRISONIANS.

1857—­1858.

One scarcely could imagine a more unfavorable time than the winter of 1857 for a campaign under the Garrisonian banner of “No Union with Slaveholders.”  The anti-slavery forces were divided among themselves, but were slowly crystallizing into the Republican party.  The triumph of the Democrats over Republicans, Know Nothings and Whigs at the recent presidential election had warned these diverse elements that it was only by uniting that they could hope to prevent the further extension of slavery.  The “Dred Scott decision” by the Supreme Court of the United States, declaring “slaves to be not persons but property” and the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional and void, had roused a whirlwind of indignation throughout the Northern States.  Those who were seeking to prevent the extension of slavery into the Territories were stigmatized by their opponents as traitors defying the Constitution.  While this supported the claim of the Garrisonians that the Constitution did sanction slavery and protect the slaveholder, yet the majority of the anti-slavery people were not ready to accept the doctrine of “immediate and unconditional emancipation, even at the cost of a dissolution of the Union.”  The Republicans had polled so large a vote as to indicate that further extension of slavery could be prevented through that organization, and they were excessively hostile toward any element which threatened to antagonize or weaken it.  Thus into whatever town Miss Anthony took her little band, the backbone of the Garrison party, they had to encounter not only the hatred of the pro-slavery people, but also the enmity of this new and rapidly increasing Republican element, which at this time did not stand for the abolition of slavery, but simply for no further extension.