The paradox which faces the civilized world today is that democratic control is everywhere limited in its control of human interests.  Mankind is engaged in planting, forestry, and mining, preparing food and shelter, making clothes and machines, transporting goods and folk, disseminating news, distributing products, doing public and private personal service, teaching, advancing science, and creating art.

In this intricate whirl of activities, the theory of government has been hitherto to lay down only very general rules of conduct, marking the limits of extreme anti-social acts, like fraud, theft, and murder.

The theory was that within these bounds was Freedom—­the Liberty to think and do and move as one wished.  The real realm of freedom was found in experience to be much narrower than this in one direction and much broader in another.  In matters of Truth and Faith and Beauty, the Ancient Law was inexcusably strait and modern law unforgivably stupid.  It is here that the future and mighty fight for Freedom must and will be made.  Here in the heavens and on the mountaintops, the air of Freedom is wide, almost limitless, for here, in the highest stretches, individual freedom harms no man, and, therefore, no man has the right to limit it.

On the other hand, in the valleys of the hard, unyielding laws of matter and the social necessities of time production, and human intercourse, the limits on our freedom are stern and unbending if we would exist and thrive.  This does not say that everything here is governed by incontrovertible “natural” law which needs no human decision as to raw materials, machinery, prices, wages, news-dissemination, education of children, etc.; but it does mean that decisions here must be limited by brute facts and based on science and human wants.

Today the scientific and ethical boundaries of our industrial activities are not in the hands of scientists, teachers, and thinkers; nor is the intervening opportunity for decision left in the control of the public whose welfare such decisions guide.  On the contrary, the control of industry is largely in the hands of a powerful few, who decide for their own good and regardless of the good of others.  The making of the rules of Industry, then, is not in the hands of All, but in the hands of the Few.  The Few who govern industry envisage, not the wants of mankind, but their own wants.  They work quietly, often secretly, opposing Law, on the one hand, as interfering with the “freedom of industry”; opposing, on the other hand, free discussion and open determination of the rules of work and wealth and wages, on the ground that harsh natural law brooks no interference by Democracy.

These things today, then, are not matters of free discussion and determination.  They are strictly controlled.  Who controls them?  Who makes these inner, but powerful, rules?  Few people know.  Others assert and believe these rules are “natural”—­a part of our inescapable physical environment.  Some of them doubtless are; but most of them are just as clearly the dictates of self-interest laid down by the powerful private persons who today control industry.  Just here it is that modern men demand that Democracy supplant skilfully concealed, but all too evident, Monarchy.