But I hear it rung continually in my ears, now and formerly,—­“The preamble! what will become of the preamble, if you repeal this tax?”—­I am sorry to be compelled so often to expose the calamities and disgraces of Parliament.  The preamble of this law, standing as it now stands, has the lie direct given to it by the provisionary part of the act:  if that can be called provisionary which makes no provision.  I should be afraid to express myself in this manner, especially in the face of such a formidable array of ability as is now drawn up before me, composed of the ancient household troops of that side of the House and the new recruits from this, if the matter were not clear and indisputable.  Nothing but truth could give me this firmness; but plain truth and clear evidence can be beat down by no ability.  The clerk will be so good as to turn to the act, and to read this favorite preamble.

“Whereas it is expedient that a revenue should be raised in your Majesty’s dominions in America, for making a more certain and adequate provision for defraying the charge of the administration of justice and support of civil government in such provinces where it shall be found necessary, and towards further defraying the expenses of defending, protecting, and securing the said dominions.”

You have heard this pompous performance.  Now where is the revenue which is to do all these mighty things?  Five sixths repealed,—­abandoned,—­sunk,—­gone,—­lost forever.  Does the poor solitary tea-duty support the purposes of this preamble?  Is not the supply there stated as effectually abandoned as if the tea-duty had perished in the general wreck?  Here, Mr. Speaker, is a precious mockery:—­a preamble without an act,—­taxes granted in order to be repealed,—­and the reasons of the grant still carefully kept up!  This is raising a revenue in America!  This is preserving dignity in England!  If you repeal this tax, in compliance with the motion, I readily admit that you lose this fair preamble.  Estimate your loss in it.  The object of the act is gone already; and all you suffer is the purging the statute-book of the opprobrium of an empty, absurd, and false recital.

It has been said again and again, that the five taxes were repealed on commercial principles.  It is so said in the paper in my hand:[3] a paper which I constantly carry about; which I have often used, and shall often use again.  What is got by this paltry pretence of commercial principles I know not; for, if your government in America is destroyed by the repeal of taxes, it is of no consequence upon what ideas the repeal is grounded.  Repeal this tax, too, upon commercial principles, if you please.  These principles will serve as well now as they did formerly.  But you know that either your objection to a repeal from these supposed consequences has no validity, or that this pretence never could remove it.  This commercial motive never was believed