This is the whole history of the suzerainty dispute between the two Governments.  The South African Republic had asked for arbitration on certain questions, and England, with Mr. Chamberlain as spokesman, had refused, because a suzerain Power could not be expected to settle disputes with its vassal by means of arbitration.  So that according to the new principles of International Law, based on the “screw” ethics of Birmingham, it was to be judge and jury in its own disputes with other people.

The position taken up by our Government in this remarkable controversy is substantiated by the actions of Lord Derby during the negotiations about the Conventions, as well as by the following telegram, which he sent to the High Commissioner for communication to the two Republics:—­

     HIGH COMMISSIONER, CAPE TOWN.

     To BRITISH RESIDENT, PRETORIA.

Please inform Transvaal Government that I have received the following from the Secretary of State:—­27th February.  Convention signed to-day.  New south-western boundary as proposed, following trade road.  British Protectorate country outside Transvaal established with delegates’ consent.  They promise to appoint Border Commissioner inside Transvaal, co-operate with ours outside; Mackenzie—­British Resident.  Debt reduced to quarter million.  Same complete internal independence in Transvaal as in Orange Free State.  Conduct and control diplomatic intercourse Foreign Governments conceded.  Queen’s final approval treaties reserved.  Delegates appear well satisfied and cordial feeling two Governments.  You may make the above known.

This Convention is also substantiated by the express declarations of Lord Rosmead and the Rev. D.P.  Faure to the effect that it was clearly understood, at the time the London Convention was concluded, that the suzerainty was abolished.  It is unnecessary to add anything about the evidence of the Members of the Transvaal Deputation.  The suzerainty has thus not the slightest shadow of existence; and yet, as will be proved, Mr. Chamberlain is prepared to go to war with the South African Republic over this question, a war which will, according to his intentions, result in Annexation.

[Sidenote:  Uitlander grievances and Capitalistic agitation.]

While the two Governments were occupied with this question the Capitalists were not idle.  They were busy fanning the flame in another direction.  It was not only a fact that Rhodesia was an unexpected failure, but it had proved far richer in native wars than in payable gold mines.  The Capitalist groups possessing the greatest interests in the Witwatersrand gold mines were also the most deeply interested in Rhodesia, and it naturally occurred to them that their Transvaal mines ought also to bear the burden of their unprofitable investments in Rhodesia—­an adjustment which would, however, necessitate the amalgamation of the two countries, especially when the interests of the shareholders were considered.