Compromise enters more or less into the settlement of all burning political questions.  That is inevitable under the party system; but of all questions under the sun, Home Rule questions are the least susceptible of compromise so engendered.  The subject, in reality, is not suitable for settlement at Westminster.  This is a matter of experience, not of assertion.  Within the present bounds of the Empire no lasting Constitution has ever been framed for a subordinate State to the moulding of which Parliament, in the character of a party assembly, contributed an active share.  Constitutions which promote prosperity and loyalty have actually or virtually been framed by those who were to live under them.  If circumstances make it impossible to adopt this course for Ireland, let us nevertheless remember that all the friction and enmity between the Mother Country and subordinate States have arisen, not from the absence, but from the inadequacy of self-governing powers.  Checks and restrictions, so far from benefiting Great Britain or the Colonies, have damaged both in different degrees, the Colonies suffering most because these checks and restrictions produce in the country submitted to them peculiar mischiefs which exist neither under a despotic regime nor an unnatural Legislative Union, fruitful of evil as both those systems are.  The damage is not evanescent, but is apt to bite deep into national character and to survive the abolition of the institutions which caused it.  The Anglo-Irish Union was created and has ever since been justified by a systematic defamation of Irish character.  If it is at length resolved to bury the slander and trust Ireland, in the name of justice and reason let the trust be complete and the institutions given her such as to permit full play to her best instincts and tendencies, not such as to deflect them into wrong paths.  Let us be scrupulously careful to avoid mistakes which might lead to a fresh campaign of defamation like that waged against Canada, as well as Ireland, between 1830 and 1840.

The position, I take it, is that most Irish Unionists still count, rightly or wrongly, on defeating Home Rule, not only in the first Parliamentary battle, but by exciting public opinion during the long period of subsequent delay which the Parliament Bill permits.  Not until Home Rule is a moral certainty, and perhaps not even then, do the extremists intend to consider the Irish Constitution in a practical spirit.  Surely this is a perilous policy.  Surely it must be so regarded by the moderate men—­and there are many—­who, if Home Rule comes, intend to throw their abilities into making it a success, and who will be indispensable to Ireland at a moment of supreme national importance.  Irretrievable mistakes may be made by too long a gamble with the chances of political warfare.  Whatever the scheme produced, the extremists will have to oppose it tooth and nail.  If the measure is big, sound, and generous, it will be necessary to attack its best features with