INTRODUCTION

My purpose in this volume is to advocate a definite scheme of self-government for Ireland.  That task necessarily involves an historical as well as a constructive argument.  It would be truer, perhaps, to say that the greater part of the constructive case for Home Rule must necessarily be historical.  To postulate a vague acceptance of the principle of Home Rule, and to proceed at once to the details of the Irish Constitution, would be a waste of time and labour.  It is impossible even to attempt to plan the framework of a Home Rule Bill without a tolerably close knowledge not only of Anglo-Irish relations, but of the Imperial history of which they form a part.  The Act will succeed exactly in so far as it gives effect to the lessons of experience.  It will fail at every point where those lessons are neglected.  Constitutions which do not faithfully reflect the experience of the sovereign power which accords them, and of the peoples which have to live under them, are at the best perilous experiments liable to defeat the end of their framers.

I shall enter into history only so far as it is relevant to the constitutional problem, using the comparative method, and confining myself almost exclusively to the British Empire past and present.  For the purposes of the Irish controversy it is unnecessary to travel farther.  In one degree or another every one of the vexed questions which make up the Irish problem has arisen again and again within the circle of the English-speaking races.  As a nation we have a body of experience applicable to the case of Ireland incomparably greater than that possessed by any other race in the world.  If, from timidity, prejudice, or sheer neglect, we fail to use it, we shall earn the heavy censure reserved for those who sin against the light.

For the comparative sketch I shall attempt, materials in the shape of facts established beyond all controversy are abundant.  Colonial history, thanks to colonial freedom, is almost wholly free from the distorting influence of political passion.  South African history alone will need revision in the light of recent events.  When, under the alchemy of free national institutions, Ireland has undergone the same transformation as South Africa, her unhappy history will be chronicled afresh with a juster sense of perspective and a juster apportionment of responsibility for the calamities which have befallen her.  And yet, if we consider the field for partisan bias which Irish history presents, the amount of ground common to writers of all shades of political opinion is now astonishingly large.  The result, I think, is due mainly to the good influence of that eminent historian and Unionist politician, the late Professor Lecky.  Indeed, an advocate of Home Rule, nervously suspicious of tainted material, could afford to rely solely on his “History of Ireland in the Eighteenth Century,” “Leaders of Public Opinion in Ireland,” and “Clerical