they thought it for the publick good:  And the People have wisely consulted their own welfare in it.  Suppose, for example, that there be a Jarring between the three Estates, which renders their sitting at that time Impracticable; since none of them can pretend to Judge the proceedings of the other two, the Judgment of the whole must either reside in a Superiour power, or the discord must terminate in the ruine of them all.  For if one of the three incroach too far, there is so much lost in the Balance of the Estates, and so much more Arbitrary power in one; ’Tis as certain in Politiques, as in Nature; That where the Sea prevails the Land loses.  If no such discord should arise, my Authors Argument is of no farther use:  for where the Soveraign and Parliament agree, there can be no deluding of the People; So, that in short, his quarrel is to the constitution of the Government.

And we see what nettles him, That the King has learnt from the unhappy example of his Father, not to perpetuate a Parliament.  But he will tell you, that they desire only a lasting Parliament, which may dispatch all causes necessary and proper for the publick:  And I Answer him, that it lyes in themselves to make it so.  But who shall Judge when it shall be proper to put an end to such a Parliament? there is no farther Answer left him; but only, that the Reason of things is the only Rule:  for when all necessary causes are dispatch’d, then is the proper time of Dissolution.  But if you mark it, this Argumentation is still running in a Circle.  For the Parliament, that is the House of Commons, would constitute themselves Judges of this reason of things; and of what causes were necessary to be dispatch’d.  So that my Author had as good have laid down this Position bare-fac’d, that a Parliament ought never to be Dissolved, till an House of Commons would sit no longer.

My Author goes on scoffingly, That he has nothing to say for those angry men (he means of his own Party) whose particular Designs are disappointed; only that they might have kept their places; and that he can find no difference betwixt them who are out, and those who are put in, but that the former could have ruin’d us, and would not:  and these cannot if they would.

I am willing to let them pass as lightly as he pleases:  Angry they are, and they know the Proverb.  I hope I may have leave to observe transiently, that none but angry men, that is, such as hold themselves disobliged at Court, are the Pillars of his Party.  And where are then the principles of Vertue, Honour and Religion, which they would persuade the World, have animated their endeavours for the publick?  What were they before they were thus Angry? or what would they be, could they make so firm an Interest in Court, that they might venture themselves in that bottom?  This, the whole Party cannot choose but know; for Knaves can easily smell out one another.  My Author, an experienced man, makes but very little