[Footnote 219: Daily Life of the Tasmanians, p. 64.]
[Footnote 220: Howitt, “The Dieri and Other Kindred Tribes of Central Australia,” Journal of the Anthropological Institute, Vol. XX, p. 87; Roth, Ethnological Studies among the North-West-Central Queensland Aborigines, p. 174; Spencer and Gillen, loc. cit., p. 93.]
[Footnote 221: Cf. pp. 136ff. of this volume.]
[Footnote 222: Howitt, “The Dieri and Other Kindred Tribes of Central Australia,” Journal of the Anthropological Institute, Vol. XX, p. 58.]
[Footnote 223: Spencer and Gillen, loc. cit., pp. 62, 63.]
[Footnote 224: Fison and Howitt, Kamilaroi and Kurnai, p. 200.]
[Footnote 225: Ibid., p. 354.]
[Footnote 226: Fison and Howitt, loc. cit., p. 288, quoting Rev. John Bulmer on the Wa-imbio tribe.]
[Footnote 227: Spencer and Gillen, loc. cit., p. 554.]
[Footnote 228: Loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 108. At the same time, Curr thinks that capture was formerly more frequent.]
[Footnote 229: Misapprehension as to the prevalence of marriage by capture is due in the main to two causes: (1) cases of elopement have been classed as cases of capture; (2) the so-called survivals of marriage by capture in historical times, of which so much has been made, are merely systematized expressions of the coyness of the female, differing in no essential point from the coyness of the female among birds at the pairing season.]
[Footnote 230: Curr, loc. cit., Vol. I, p. 107.]
[Footnote 231: Loc. cit., p. 181.]
[Footnote 232: Haddon, “Ethnography of the Western Tribes of Torres Straits,” Journal of the Anthropological Institute, Vol. XIX, p. 414.]
[Footnote 233: Ibid., p. 356.]
[Footnote 234: Loc. cit., p. 285.]
[Footnote 235: Cf. “The Gaming Instinct,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. VI, pp. 736ff., et passim.]
[Footnote 236: Cf. pp. 208ff. of this volume.]
[Footnote 237: William James, Principles of Psychology, Vol. II, p. 435.]
[Footnote 238: “The Evolution of Modesty,” Psychological Review, Vol. VI, pp. 134ff.]
[Footnote 239: James, loc. cit., p. 436.]
[Footnote 240: Darwin’s explanation of shyness, modesty, shame, and blushing as due originally to “self-attention directed to personal appearance, in relation to the opinion of others,” appears to me to be a very good statement of some of the aspects of the process, but hardly an adequate explanation of the process as a whole. (Darwin, Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, p. 326.)]
[Footnote 241: James R. Angell and Helen B. Thompson, “A Study of the Relations between Certain Organic Processes and Consciousness,” University of Chicago Contributions to Philosophy, Vol. II, No. 2, pp. 32-69.]