of expression, that Raphael came to Florence on purpose
to study it; and it was the power of giving boldness
and dignity and variety to the human figure, as shown
in this painting, which constitutes his great originality
and transcendent excellence. The great creations
of the painters, in modern times as well as in the
ancient, are those which represent the human figure
in its ideal excellence,—which of course
implies what is most perfect, not in any one man or
woman, but in men and women collectively. Hence
the greatest of painters rarely have stooped to landscape
painting, since no imaginary landscape can surpass
what everybody has seen in nature. You cannot
improve on the colors of the rainbow, or the gilded
clouds of sunset; or the shadows of the mountain,
or the graceful form of trees, or the varied tints
of leaves and flowers; but you can represent the figure
of a man or woman more beautiful than any one man or
woman that has ever appeared. What mortal woman
ever expressed the ethereal beauty depicted in a Madonna
of Raphael or Murillo? And what man ever had
such a sublimity of aspect and figure as the creations
of Michael Angelo? Why, “a beggar,”
says one of his greatest critics, “arose from
his hand the patriarch of poverty; the hump of his
dwarf is impressed with dignity; his infants are men,
and his men are giants.” And, says another
critic, “he is the inventor of epic painting,
in that sublime circle of the Sistine Chapel which
exhibits the origin, progress, and final dispensation
of the theocracy. He has personified motion in
the cartoon of Pisa, portrayed meditation in the prophets
and sibyls of the Sistine Chapel and in the Last Judgment,
traced every attitude which varies the human body,
with every passion which sways the human soul.”
His supremacy is in the mighty soaring of his intellectual
conceptions. Marvellous as a creator, like Shakspeare;
profound and solemn, like Dante; representing power
even in repose, and giving to the Cyclopean forms which
he has called into being a charm of moral excellence
which secures our sympathy; a firm believer in a supreme
and personal God; disciplined in worldly trials, and
glowing in lofty conceptions of justice,—he
delights in portraying the stern prophets of Israel,
surrounded with an atmosphere of holiness, yet breathing
compassion on those whom they denounce; august in
dignity, yet melting with tenderness; solemn, sad,
profound. Thus was his influence pure and exalted
in an art which has too often been prostituted to please
the perverted taste of a sensual age. The most
refined and expressive of all the arts,—as
it sometimes is, and always should be,—is
the one which oftenest appeals to that which Christianity
teaches us to shun. You may say, “Evil
to him who evil thinks,” especially ye pure
and immaculate persons who have walked uncorrupted
amid the galleries of Paris, Dresden, Florence, and
Rome; but I fancy that pictures, like books, are what
we choose to make them, and that the more exquisite