at Leipsic; or any theatrical excitement such as was
produced on cultivated intellects when Garrick and
Siddons represented the sublime conceptions of the
myriad-minded Shakspeare. These glories may
reappear, but never will they shine as they did before.
No more Olympian games, no more Roman triumphs, no
more Dodona oracles, no more Flavian amphitheatres,
no more Mediaeval cathedrals, no more councils of
Nice or Trent, no more spectacles of kings holding
the stirrups of popes, no more Fields of the Cloth
of Gold, no more reigns of court mistresses in such
palaces as Versailles and Fontainbleau,—ah!
I wish I could add, no more such battlefields as Marengo
and Waterloo,—only copies and imitations
of these, and without the older charm. The world
is moving on and perpetually changing, nor can we tell
what new vanity will next arise,—vanity
or glory, according to our varying notions of the
dignity and destiny of man. We may predict that
it will not be any mechanical improvement, for ere
long the limit will be reached,—and it
will be reached when the great mass cannot find work
to do, for the everlasting destiny of man is toil
and labor. But it will be some sublime wonders
of which we cannot now conceive, and which in time
will pass away for other wonders and novelties, until
the great circle is completed; and all human experiments
shall verify the moral wisdom of the eternal revelation.
Then all that man has done, all that man can do, in
his own boastful thought, will be seen, in the light
of the celestial verities, to be indeed a vanity and
a failure, not of human ingenuity and power, but to
realize the happiness which is only promised as the
result of supernatural, not mortal, strength, yet
which the soul in its restless aspirations never ceases
its efforts to secure,—everlasting Babel-building
to reach the unattainable on earth.
Now the revival of art in Italy was one of the great
movements in the series of human development.
It peculiarly characterized the fifteenth and sixteenth
centuries. It was an age of artistic wonders,
of great creations.
Italy, especially, was glorious when Michael Angelo
was born, 1474; when the rest of Europe was comparatively
rude, and when no great works in art, in poetry, in
history, or philosophy had yet appeared. He
was descended from an illustrious family, and was
destined to one of the learned professions; but he
could not give up his mind to anything but drawing,—as
annoying to his father as Galileo’s experiments
were to his parent; as unmeaning to him as Gibbon’s
History was to George III.,—“Scribble,
scribble, scribble; Mr. Gibbon, I perceive, sir, you
are always a-scribbling.” No perception
of a new power, no sympathy with the abandonment to
a specialty not indorsed by fashions and traditions,
but without which abandonment genius cannot easily
be developed. At last the father yielded, and
the son was apprenticed to a painter—a
degradation in the eyes of Mediaeval aristocracy.