The Jesuits are accused further of political intrigues:  this is a common and notorious charge.  They sought to control the cabinets of Europe; they had their spies in every country.  The intrigues of Campion and Parsons in England aimed at the restoration of Catholic monarchs.  Mary of Scotland was a tool in their hands, and so was Madame de Maintenon in France.  La Chaise and Le Tellier were mere politicians.  The Jesuits became political priests; the history of Europe the last three hundred years is full of their cabals.  Their political influence was directed to the persecution of Protestants as well as infidels.  They are accused of securing the revocation of the Edict of Nantes,—­one of the greatest crimes in the history of modern times, which led to the expulsion of four hundred thousand Protestants from France, and the execution of four hundred thousand more.  They incited the dragonnades of Louis XIV., who was under their influence.  They are accused of the assassination of kings, of the fires of Smithfield, of the Gunpowder Plot, of the cruelties inflicted by Alva, of the Thirty Years’ War, of the ferocities of the Guises, of inquisitions and massacres, of sundry other political crimes, with what justice I do not know; but certain it is they became objects of fear, and incurred the hostilities of Catholic Europe, especially of all liberal thinkers, and their downfall was demanded by the very courts of Europe.  Why did they lose their popularity?  Why were they so distrusted and hated?  The fact that they were hated is most undoubted, and there must have been cause for it.  It is a fact that at one time they were respected and honored, and deserved to be so:  must there not have been grave reasons for the universal change in public opinion respecting them.  The charges against them, to which I have alluded, must have had foundation.  They did not become idle, gluttonous, ignorant, and sensual like the old monks:  they became greedy of power; and in order to retain it resorted to intrigues, conspiracies, and persecutions.  They corrupted philosophy and morality, abused the confessional, privilege, adopted success as their watchword, without regard to the means; they are charged with becoming worldly, ambitious, mercenary, unscrupulous, cruel; above all, they sought to bind the minds of men with a despotic yoke, and waged war against all liberalizing influences.  They always were, from first to last, narrow, pedantic, one-sided, legal, technical, pharisaical.  The best thing about them, in the days of their declining power, was that they always opposed infidel sentiments.  They hated Voltaire and Rousseau and the Encyclopedists as much as they did Luther and Calvin.  They detested the principles of the French Revolution, partly because those principles were godless, partly because they were emancipating.