of Solomon was never more clearly demonstrated than
when he said: “Train up a child in the
way he should go; and when he is old, he will not depart
from it.” It is a piece of world philosophy
which has reigned unquestioned throughout the ages—a
policy upon which human discernment, in Church and
State, has relied with unfailing effect; “for
the thoughts of a child are long, long thoughts”—those
well-remembered words, how true; for those “long
thoughts”—the mental environment of
the formative period of child-life—do inevitably
determine the future character of the individual,
and the immediate result of neglect in these vitally
important stages is painfully and promptly apparent
in the aggressive and unchildlike deportment of the
turbulent young neophytes of both sexes, so disproportionately
in evidence in all directions throughout the community
of the present, as to bring into ridicule and utter
contempt existing methods of control. This dire
defect in individual restraint may be largely ascribed
to both physical and mental degeneracy, of hereditary
origin; and when to this is added the attempts of
parents to maintain the tranquility of the home by
threats, bribery and fatuous promises—undue
severity on the one hand and undue licence on the
other—serious developments are not far to
seek. It has been well said that children who
are governed through their appetites in their infancy
are usually governed by their appetites in maturity.
Thus it is, by unwise methods of control which appeal
wholly to the spirit of greed, emulation and selfishness
in the child—the purely animal instincts—with
perhaps the occasional degrading influence of corporal
punishment, as a later development, that so many young
lives are wrecked and the downward path made easy
which leads through duplicity to crime. The infantile
precosity of the age leaves little scope for the old-time
sentimental prudery of parents who fail to discriminate
between innocence and ignorance; but it has been stated
by a well known American authority on the subject
of child-culture, whose experience of child-life and
schools is nation-wide, that only about one child in
a hundred receives proper instruction early enough
to protect it from vice. Then again there supervenes
the evil of the competitive school system which, too
frequently, forces the education of a child beyond
the natural order of growth. Countless numbers
of little ones are injured by enforced premature development,
thereby diverting the vital forces to the development
of the brain which should be devoted to the development
of the body.
Encompassed by such a chain of adverse circumstances as the combined result of parental egotism and pedantic, pedagogical ignorance, is it wonderful, I would ask, that the ghastly record of the hideous sacrifice of child-life is what it is, and that the young lives which do by chance escape the horrible holocaust, still reap the prevailing harvest of prolific ills of which the coming explanation will give some adequate conception.