roof, with a large flat oblong space in the centre
of the ceiling. The whole of this vault and the
lunettes beneath were painted by Lanini; so runs the
tradition of the fresco-painter’s name; and
though much injured by centuries of outrage, and somewhat
marred by recent restoration, these frescoes form
a precious monument of Lombard art. The object
of the painter’s design seems to have been the
glorification of Music. In the central compartment
of the roof is an assembly of the gods, obviously borrowed
from Raphael’s ‘Marriage of Cupid and Psyche’
in the Farnesina at Rome. The fusion of Roman
composition with Lombard execution constitutes the
chief charm of this singular work, and makes it, so
far as I am aware, unique. Single figures of the
goddesses, and the whole movement of the scene upon
Olympus, are transcribed without attempt at concealment.
And yet the fresco is not a barefaced copy. The
manner of feeling and of execution is quite different
from that of Raphael’s school. The poetry
and sentiment are genuinely Lombard. None of
Raphael’s pupils could have carried out his design
with a delicacy of emotion and a technical skill in
colouring so consummate. What, we think, as we
gaze upward, would the Master have given for such a
craftsman? The hardness, coarseness, and animal
crudity of the Roman School are absent: so also
is their vigour. But where the grace of form
and colour is so soft and sweet, where the high-bred
calm of good company is so sympathetically rendered,
where the atmosphere of amorous languor and of melody
is so artistically diffused, we cannot miss the powerful
modelling and rather vulgar tours de force of
Giulio Romano. The scale of tone is silvery golden.
There are no hard blues, no coarse red flesh-tints,
no black shadows. Mellow lights, the morning
hues of primrose, or of palest amber, pervade the whole
society. It is a court of gentle and harmonious
souls; and though this style of beauty might cloy,
at first sight there is something ravishing in those
yellow-haired white-limbed, blooming deities.
No movement of lascivious grace as in Correggio, no
perturbation of the senses as in some of the Venetians,
disturbs the rhythm of their music; nor is the pleasure
of the flesh, though felt by the painter and communicated
to the spectator, an interruption to their divine
calm. The white, saffron-haired goddesses are
grouped together like stars seen in the topaz light
of evening, like daffodils half smothered in snowdrops,
and among them, Diana, with the crescent on her forehead,
is the fairest. Her dream-like beauty need fear
no comparison with the Diana of the Camera di S. Paolo.
Apollo and Bacchus are scarcely less lovely in their
bloom of earliest manhood; honey-pale, as Greeks would
say; like statues of living electron; realising Simaetha’s
picture of her lover and his friend:
[Greek:
tois d’ en xanthotera men elichrysoio
geneias,
stethea de stilbonta poly pleon e tu Selana.[9]]