Mr. Harrisse quotes from a manuscript authority to show, that when William Penn besieged the city of San Domingo in 1655, all the bodies buried under the cathedral were withdrawn from view, lest the heretics should profane them, and that “the old Admiral’s” body was treated like the rest.

Mr. Harrisse calls to mind the fact that the earthquake of the nineteenth of May, 1673, demolished the cathedral in part, and the tombs which it contained.  He says, “the ruin of the colony, the climate, weather, and carelessness all contributed to the loss from sight and the forgetfulness of the bones of Columbus, mingled with the dust of his descendants”; and Mr. Harrisse does not believe that any vestige of them was ever found afterwards, in San Domingo or anywhere else.  This remark, from the person who has given such large attention to the subject, is interesting.  For it is generally stated and believed that the bones were afterwards removed to Havana in the island of Cuba.  The opinion of Mr. Harrisse, as it has been quoted, is entitled to very great respect and authority.

A very curious question has arisen in later times as to the actual place where the remains now are.  On this question there is great discussion among historians, and many reports, official and unofficial, have been published with regard to it.

In the year 1867, the proposal was made to the Holy Father at Rome, that Columbus should receive the honors known in the Roman Catholic Church as the honors of beatification.  In 1877, De Lorgues, the enthusiastic biographer of Columbus, represents that the inquiry had gone so far that these honors had been determined on.  One who reads his book would be led to suppose that Columbus had already been recognized as on the way to be made a saint of the Church.  But, in truth, though some such inquiry was set on foot, he never received the formal honors of beatification.

*****

We have one account by a contemporary of the appearance of Columbus.(*) We are told that he was a “robust man, quite tall, of florid complexion, with a long face.”

     (*) In the first Decade of Peter Martyr.

In the next generation, Oviedo says Columbus was “of good aspect, and above the middle stature.  His limbs were strong, his eyes quick, and all the parts of his body well proportioned.  His hair was decidedly reddish, and the complexion of his face quite florid and marked with spots of red.”

Bishop Las Casas knew the admiral personally, and describes him in these terms:  “He was above the middle stature, his face was long and striking, his nose was aquiline, his eyes clear blue, his complexion light, tending towards a distinct florid expression, his beard and hair blonde in his youth, but they were blanched at an early age by care.”

Las Casas says in another place, “he was rude in bearing, and careless as to his language.  He was, however, gracious when he chose to be, but he was angry when he was annoyed.”