the States; it were ridiculous to assert that the
Government at Washington is only the Government of
New York under another name. Where a Confederacy
consists in reality, if not in name, of two States
only, of which the one has at least four or five times
the power of the other, the authority of the Confederacy
means the authority of the powerful State. “Irish
Federalism,” if in reality established, would
soon generate a demand from Ireland, not unreasonable
in itself, under the circumstances of the case, that
the whole British Empire should be turned into a Confederacy,
under the guidance of a general Congress. Thus
alone could Ireland become a real State, the member
of a genuine Confederation. Hence arises a new
danger. Apply Federalism to Ireland and you immediately
provoke demands for autonomy in other parts of the
United Kingdom, and for constitutional changes in
other parts of the British Empire. Federalism,
which in other lands has been a step towards Union,
would, it is likely enough, be in our case the first
stage towards a dissolution of the United Kingdom
into separate States, and hence towards the breaking-up
of the British Empire. This is no future or imaginary
peril; the mere proposal of Home Rule, under something
like a Federal form, has already made it an immediate
and pressing danger. Sir Gavan Duffy, by far the
ablest among the Irish advocates of Home Rule, predicts
that before ten years have elapsed there will be a
Federation of the Empire.[37] A majority of Scotch
electors support the policy of Mr. Gladstone, and forthwith
a most respectable Scotch periodical puts forward
a plan of Home Rule for Scotland. Canon MacColl
already suggests that we should make tentatively an
experiment capable of development into a permanent
system on the lines of the American Constitution,
and make it not only in Ireland, but also perhaps
gradually in Scotland, and even in Wales.[38] It is
unnecessary to discuss Canon MacColl’s argument
at length. When he tells his readers that “the
Constitution which Mr. Gladstone desires to create
in Ireland is modelled on the system existing in the
great colonies of the Empire; there are certain variations
and some novelties in the Irish scheme, but these
are the lines on which it is drawn;” he ventures
a statement on which, as a lawyer, I need make but
one comment. It is a statement as erroneous and
misleading as can be any assertion made in good faith
by a writer who must be presumed to have studied the
measure of which he is speaking. When the same
authority asks why should a system which imparts strength
to America, to Austria, and to Germany, disintegrate
and ruin the British Empire, he raises an inquiry which
does not admit of an answer, since it assumes the identity
of things which are radically different. The
system which may or may not impart strength to Austria
is no more the system which imparts strength to America,
than the system which imparts strength to England is
the same as the system which does or does not impart
strength to Russia. To lump under one head every
policy which can by any straining of the terms be
brought under the heads of “Federalism”
or “Home Rule,” is neither more nor less
absurd than to classify together every Constitution
which can be called a monarchy.