A strong and more general instance of agreement is the following.—­The first three evangelists have related the appointment of the twelve apostles; (Matt. x. 1.  Mark iii. 14.  Luke vi. 12.) and have given a catalogue of their names in form.  John, without ever mentioning the appointment, or giving the catalogue, supposes, throughout his whole narrative, Christ to be accompanied by a select party of disciples; the number of these to be twelve; (Chap. vi. 70.) and whenever he happens to notice any one as of that number, (Chap. xx, 24; vi. 71.) it is one included in the catalogue of the other evangelists:  and the names principally occurring in the course of his history of Christ are the names extant in their list.  This last agreement, which is of considerable moment, runs through every Gospel, and through every chapter of each.  All this bespeaks reality.

CHAPTER V.

Originality of our saviour’s character.

The Jews, whether right or wrong, had understood their prophecies to foretell the advent of a person who by some supernatural assistance should advance their nation to independence, and to a supreme degree of splendour and prosperity.  This was the reigning opinion and expectation of the times.  Now, had Jesus been an enthusiast, it is probable that his enthusiasm would have fallen in with the popular delusion, and that, while he gave himself out to be the person intended by these predictions, he would have assumed the character to which they were universally supposed to relate.

Had he been an impostor, it was his business to have flattered the prevailing hopes, because these hopes were to be the instruments of his attraction and success.

But what is better than conjectures is the fact, that all the pretended Messiahs actually did so.  We learn from Josephus that there were many of these.  Some of them, it is probable, might be impostors, who thought that an advantage was to be taken of the state of public opinion.  Others, perhaps, were enthusiasts, whose imagination had been drawn to this particular object by the language and sentiments which prevailed around them.  But whether impostors or enthusiasts, they concurred in producing themselves in the character which their countrymen looked for, that is to say, as the restorers and deliverers of the nation, in that sense in which restoration and deliverance were expected by the Jews.

Why therefore Jesus, if he was, like them, either an enthusiast or impostor, did not pursue the same conduct as they did, in framing his character and pretensions, it will be found difficult to explain.  A mission, the operation and benefit of which was to take place in another life, was a thing unthought of as the subject of these prophecies.  That Jesus, coming to them as their Messiah, should come under a character totally different from that in which they expected him; should deviate from the general persuasion, and deviate into pretensions absolutely singular and original—­appears to be inconsistent with the imputation of enthusiasm or imposture, both which by their nature I should expect would, and both which, throughout the experience which this very subject furnishes, in fact, have followed the opinions that obtained at the time.