or, in more recent times, when men, and even women,
have all but expired under the lash; no deeds of savage
vengeance have ever exceeded those which were perpetrated
daily and hourly in Ireland, before the rebellion
of 1798. For the sake of our common humanity
I would that they could be passed over unrecorded;
for the sake of our common humanity I shall record
them in detail, for it may be that the terror of what
men can become when they give way to unrestrained
passions, may deter some of my fellow-creatures from
allowing themselves to participate in or to enact
such deeds of blood. Historical justice, too,
demands that they should be related. Englishmen
have heard much of the cruelties of Irish rebels at
Wexford, which I shall neither palliate nor excuse.
Englishmen have heard but little of the inhuman atrocities
which excited that insurrection, and prompted these
reprisals. And let it be remembered, that there
are men still living who saw these cruelties enacted
in their childhood, and men whose fathers and nearest
relations were themselves subjected to these tortures.
To the Celt, so warm of heart and so tenacious of
memory, what food this is for the tempter, who bids
him recall, and bids him revenge, even now, these
wrongs! What wonder if passion should take the
place of reason, and if religion, which commands him
to suffer patiently the memory of injuries inflicted
on others, often harder to bear than one’s own
pain, should sometimes fail to assert its sway![577]
I shall give the account of these atrocities in the
words of a Protestant historian first. The Rev.
Mr. Gordon writes thus, in his narrative of these
fearful times: “The fears of the people
became so great at length, that they forsook their
houses in the night, and slept (if, under such circumstances,
they could sleep) in the ditches and the women were
even delivered in that exposed condition, These
facts were notorious at the time.... Some
abandoned their house from fear of being whipped;
and this infliction many persons appeared to fear more
than death itself. Many unfortunate men were
strung up as it were to be hanged, but were let down
now and then, to try if strangulation would oblige
them to become informers.” He then goes
on to relate at length how the magistrates tortured
smiths and carpenters at once, because it was supposed
from their trade they must have made pikes; and how
they, at last, professed to know a United Irishman
by his face, and “never suffered any person
whom they deigned to honour with this distinction,
to pass off without convincing proof of their attention.”
He also mentions the case of a hermit named Driscoll,
whose name and the same details of his sufferings
are given in Clancy’s account of the insurrection.
This man was strangled three times, and flogged four
times, because a Catholic prayer-book was found in
his possession, on which it was supposed that
he used to administer oaths of disloyalty.