The commercial status of the principal Irish towns at this period (A.D. 1669), is thus given by Mr. Bonnell, the head collector of Irish customs in Dublin: “Comparing together the proceeds of the duties for the six years ending December, 1669, received from the several ports of Ireland, they may be thus ranked according to their worth respectively, expressed in whole numbers, without fractions, for more clearness of apprehension:——
“Rate. Ports. Proportion
Rate. Ports Proportion
per
cent. per cent.
1 Dublin 40
{ Drogheda 3
2 Cork 10 5
{ Londonderry 3
{
Waterford 7 { Carrickfergus
3
3 { Galway 7
{ Ross 1
{
Limerick 5 { Wexford
1
4 { Kinsale 5 6
{ Dundalk 1
{
Youghal 5 { Baltimore
1
{
Sligo 1”
“Killybeg, Dungarvan, Donaghadee, Strangford, Coleraine, and Dingle, are mentioned as “under rate.”
The linen trade had been encouraged, and, indeed, mainly established in Ireland, by the Duke of Ormonde. An English writer[526] says that 200,000 pounds of yarn were sent annually to Manchester, a supply which seemed immense in that age; and yet, in the present day, would hardly keep the hands employed for forty-eight hours. A political economist of the age gives the “unsettledness of the country” as the first of a series of reasons why trade did not flourish in Ireland, and, amongst other remedies, suggests