Not so long after this, the following winter, I left St. Louis and did not see Peter for several years, during which time I drifted through various cities to New York.  We kept up a more or less desultory correspondence which resulted eventually in his contributing to a paper of which I had charge in New York, and later, in part at least I am sure, in his coming there.  I noticed one thing, that although Peter had no fixed idea as to what he wished to be—­being able to draw, write, engrave, carve and what not—­he was in no way troubled about it.  “I don’t see just what it is that I am to do best,” he said to me once.  “It may be that I will wind up as a painter or writer or collector—­I can’t tell yet.  I want to study, and meantime I’m making a living—­that’s all I want now.  I want to live, and I am living, in my way.”

Some men are masters of cities, or perhaps better, of all the elements which enter into the making of them, and Peter was one.  I think sometimes that he was born a writer of great force and charm, only as yet he had not found himself.  I have known many writers, many geniuses even, but not one his superior in intellect and romantic response to life.  He was a poet, thinker, artist, philosopher and master of prose, as a posthumous volume ("Wolf, the Autobiography of a Cave Dweller”) amply proves, but he was not ready then to fully express himself, and it troubled him not at all.  He loved life’s every facet, was gay and helpful to himself and others, and yet always with an eye for the undercurrent of human misery, error and tragedy as well as comedy.  Immediately upon coming to New York he began to examine and grasp it in a large way, its museums, public buildings, geography, politics, but after a very little while decided suddenly that he did not belong there and without a by-your-leave, although once more we had fallen into each other’s ways, he departed without a word, and I did not hear from him for months.  Temporarily at least he felt that he had to obtain more experience in a lesser field, and lost no time in so doing.  The next I knew he was connected, at a comfortable salary, with the then dominant paper of Philadelphia.

It was after he had established himself very firmly in Philadelphia that we two finally began to understand each other fully, to sympathize really with each other’s point of view as opposed to the more or less gay and casual nature of our earlier friendship.  Also here perhaps, more than before, we felt the binding influence of having worked together in the West.  It was here that I first noticed the ease with which he took hold of a city, the many-sidedness of his peculiar character which led him to reflect so many angles of it, which a less varied temperament would never have touched upon.  For, first of all, wherever he happened to be, he was intensely interested in the age and history of his city, its buildings and graveyards and tombstones which pointed to its past life, then its present physical appearance, the chief