The sagacity of M. Saint Martin,
who was for a long time the colleague
of M. Quatremere, has pointed out
in a note worthy of his erudition,
another special proof, which is
by no means to be neglected.
“Amongst the various arguments,” he says, “that might be urged in favor of the legitimacy of the monument, but of which, as yet, no use has been made, must not be forgotten the name of the priest by whom it is said to have been erected. The name Yezd-bouzid is Persian, and at the epoch when the monument was discovered it would have been impossible to invent it, as there existed no work where it could have been found. Indeed, I do not think that, even since then, there has ever been any one published in which it could have been met with.
“It is a very celebrated name among the Armenians, and comes to them from a martyr, a Persian by birth, and of the royal race, who perished towards the middle of the seventh century, and rendered his name illustrious amongst the Christian nations of the East.” Saint Martin adds in the same place, that the famous monument of Si-ngau-Fou, whose authenticity has for a long time been called in question from the hatred entertained against the Jesuit missionaries who discovered it, rather than from a candid examination of its contents, is now regarded as above all suspicion.
Chapter III.
Brahmanism.
Sec. 1. Our Knowledge of Brahmanism.
Sir William Jones.
Sec. 2. Difficulty of this Study. The
Complexity of the System. The Hindoos
have no History. Their Ultra-Spiritualism.
Sec. 3. Helps from Comparative Philology.
The Aryans in Central Asia.
Sec. 4. The Aryans in India. The Native
Races. The Vedic Age. Theology of
the Vedas.
Sec. 5. Second Period. Laws of Manu.
The Brahmanic Age.
Sec. 6. The Three Hindoo Systems of Philosophy,—the
Sankhya, Vedanta, and
Nyasa.
Sec. 7. Origin of the Hindoo Triad.
Sec. 8. The Epics, the Puranas, and Modern
Hindoo Worship.
Sec. 9. Relation of Brahmanism to Christianity.
Sec. 1. Our Knowledge of Brahmanism. Sir William Jones.