that the Celtic image of Zeus was a lofty oak, perhaps
a rough-hewn trunk rather than a growing tree, and
such roughly carved tree-trunks, images of gods, are
referred to by Lucan in his description of the Massilian
grove.[968] Pillar stones set up over the graves of
the dead are often mentioned in Irish texts. These
would certainly be associated with the dead; indeed,
existing legends show that they were believed to be
tenanted by the ghosts and to have the power of motion.
This suggests that they had been regarded as images
of the dead. Other stones honoured in Ireland
were the cloch labrais, an oracular stone;
the lia fail, or coronation stone, which shouted
when a king of the Milesian race seated himself upon
it; and the lia adrada, or stone of adoration,
apparently a boundary stone.[969] The plurima simulacra
of the Gaulish Mercury may have been boundary stones
like those dedicated to Mercury or Hermes among the
Romans and Greeks. Did Caesar conclude, or was
it actually the case, that the Gauls dedicated such
stones to a god of boundaries who might be equated
with Mercury? Many such standing stones still
exist in France, and their number must have been greater
in Caesar’s time. Seeing them the objects
of superstitious observances, he may have concluded
that they were simulacra of a god. Other
Romans besides himself had been struck by the resemblance
of these stones to their Hermai, and perhaps the Gauls,
if they did not already regard them as symbols of a
god, acquiesced in the resemblance. Thus, on
the menhir of Kervadel are sculptured four figures,
one being that of Mercury, dating from Gallo-Roman
times. Beneath another, near Peronne, a bronze
statuette of Mercury was discovered.[970] This would
seem to show that the Gauls had a cult of pillar stones
associated with a god of boundaries. Caesar probably
uses the word simulacrum in the sense of “symbol”
rather than “image,” though he may have
meant native images not fully carved in human shape,
like the Irish cermand, cerstach, ornamented
with gold and silver, the “chief idol”
of north Ireland, or like the similarly ornamented
“images” of Cromm Cruaich and his satellites.[971]
The adoration of sacred stones continued into Christian
times and was much opposed by the Church.[972] S.
Samson of Dol (sixth century) found men dancing round
a simulacrum abominabile, which seems to have
been a kind of standing stone, and having besought
them to desist, he carved a cross upon it.[973] Several
menhirion in France are now similarly ornamented.[974]
The number of existing Gallo-Roman images shows that the Celts had not adopted a custom which was foreign to them, and they must have already possessed rude native images. The disappearance of these would be explained if they were made of perishable material. Wooden images of the Matres have been occasionally found, and these may be pre-Roman. Some of the images of the three-headed and crouching gods show