era. We have to imagine a state of culture in
which it was only the Book of books to one small nation,
while to others it was at best a curious record of
ancient times, just as the Code of Hammurabi or the
Egyptian Book of Life is to us. The Alexandrian
Jews were the first to popularize its teachings, to
bring Jewish religion into line with the thought of
the Greek world. It was to this end that they
founded a particular form of Midrash—the
allegorical interpretation, which is largely a distinctive
product of the Alexandrian age. The Palestinian
rabbis of the time were on the one hand developing
by dialectic discussion the oral tradition into a
vast system of religious ritual and legal jurisprudence;
on the other, weaving around the law, by way of adornment
to it, a variegated fabric of philosophy, fable, allegory,
and legend. Simultaneously the Alexandrian preachers—they
were never quite the same as the rabbis—were
emphasizing for the outer world as well as their own
people the spiritual side of the religion, elaborating
a theology that should satisfy the reason, and seeking
to establish the harmony of Greek philosophy with
Jewish monotheism and the Mosaic legislation.
Allegorical interpretation is “based upon the
supposition or fiction that the author who is interpreted
intended something ‘other’ [Greek:
allo] than what is expressed”; it is the method
used to read thought into a text which its words do
not literally bear, by attaching to each phrase some
deeper, usually some philosophical meaning. It
enables the interpreter to bring writings of antiquity
into touch with the culture of his or any age; “the
gates of allegory are never closed, and they open
upon a path which stretches without a break through
the centuries.” In the region of jurisprudence
there is an institution with a similar purpose, which
is known as “legal fiction,” whereby old
laws by subtle interpretation are made to serve new
conditions and new needs. Allegorical interpretation
must be carefully distinguished from the writing of
allegory, of which Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s
Progress” is the best-known type. One is
the converse of the other; for in allegories moral
ideas are represented as persons and moral lessons
enforced by what purports to be a story of life.
In allegorical interpretation persons are transformed
into ideas and their history into a system of philosophy.
The Greek philosophers had applied this method to
Homer since the fourth century B.C.E., in order to
read into the epic poet, whose work they regarded
almost as a Divine revelation, their reflective theories
of the universe. And doubtless the Jewish philosophers
were influenced by their example.