districts near Philippopolis.  In the first days of May, the Christians of those parts, angered by the increase of misrule and fired with hope by the example of the Herzegovinians, had been guilty of acts of insubordination; and at Tatar Bazardjik a few Turkish officials were killed.  The movement was of no importance, as the Christians were nearly all unarmed.  Nevertheless, the authorities poured into the disaffected districts some 18,000 regulars, along with hordes of irregulars, or Bashi-Bazouks; and these, especially the last, proceeded to glut their hatred and lust in a wild orgy which desolated the whole region with a thoroughness that the Huns of Attila could scarcely have excelled (May 9-16).  In the upper valley of the Maritza out of eighty villages, all but fifteen were practically wiped out.  Batak, a flourishing town of some 7000 inhabitants, underwent a systematic massacre, culminating in the butchery of all who had taken refuge in the largest church; of the whole population only 2000 managed to escape[102].

[Footnote 102:  Mr. Baring, a secretary of the British Legation at Constantinople, after a careful examination of the evidence, gave the number of Bulgarians slain as “not fewer than 12,000”; he opined that 163 Mussulmans were perhaps killed early in May.  He admitted the Batak horrors.  Achmet Agha, their chief perpetrator, was at first condemned to death by a Turkish commission of inquiry, but he was finally pardoned.  Shefket Pasha, whose punishment was also promised, was afterwards promoted to a high command.  Parl.  Papers, Turkey, No. 2 (1877), pp. 248-249; ibid.  No. 15 (1877), No. 77, p. 58.  Mr. Layard, successor to Sir Henry Elliott at Constantinople, afterwards sought to reduce the numbers slain to 3500.  Turkey, No. 26 (1877), p. 54.]

It is painful to have to add that the British Government was indirectly responsible for these events.  Not only had it let the Turks know that it deprecated the intervention of the European Powers in Turkey (which was equivalent to giving the Turks carte blanche in dealing with their Christian subjects), but on hearing of the Herzegovina revolt, it pressed on the Porte the need of taking speedy measures to suppress them.  The despatches of Sir Henry Elliott, our ambassador at Constantinople, also show that he had favoured the use of active measures towards the disaffected districts north of Philippopolis[103].

[Footnote 103:  Parl.  Papers, Turkey, No. 3 (1876), pp. 144, 173, 198-199.]

Of course, neither the British Government nor its ambassador foresaw the awful results of this advice; but their knowledge of Turkish methods should have warned them against giving it without adding the cautions so obviously needed.  Sir Henry Elliott speedily protested against the measures adopted by the Turks, but then it was too late[104].  Furthermore, the contemptuous way in which Disraeli dismissed the first reports of the Bulgarian massacres as “coffee-house