would never have been an artist in Pater’s way; he belonged to his own generation, to which l’art pour l’art had ceased to have meaning.  There had come a pause, a throbbing silence, from which art might have emerged, may even now after the appointed time arise, with strange validities undreamed of or forgotten.  Let us not prophesy; let us be content with the recognition that Sorley’s generation was too keenly, perhaps too disastrously aware of destinies, of

    ’the beating of the wings of Love
  Shut out from his creation,’

to seek the comfort of the ivory tower.

Sorley first appears before us radiant with the white-heat of a schoolboy enthusiasm for Masefield.  Masefield is—­how we remember the feeling!—­the poet who has lived; his naked reality tears through ’the lace of putrid sentimentalism (educing the effeminate in man) which rotters like Tennyson and Swinburne have taught his (the superficial man’s) soul to love.’  It tears through more than Tennyson and Swinburne.  The greatest go down before him.

’So you see what I think of John Masefield.  When I say that he has the rapidity, simplicity, nobility of Homer, with the power of drawing character, the dramatic truth to life of Shakespeare, along with a moral and emotional strength and elevation which is all his own, and therefore I am prepared to put him above the level of these two great men—­I do not expect you to agree with me.’—­(From a paper read at Marlborough, November, 1912.)

That was Sorley at seventeen, and that, it seems to us, is the quality of enthusiasm which should be felt by a boy of seventeen if he is to make his mark.  It is infinitely more important to have felt that flaming enthusiasm for an idol who will be cast down than to have felt what we ought to feel for Shakespeare and Homer.  The gates of heaven are opened by strange keys, but they must be our own.

Within six months Masefield had gone the way of all flesh.  In a paper on The Shropshire Lad (May, 1913), curious both for critical subtlety and the faint taste of disillusion, Sorley was saying:  ’His (Masefield’s) return (to the earth) was purely emotional, and probably less interesting than the purely intellectual return of Meredith.’  At the beginning of 1914, having gained a Scholarship at University College, Oxford, he went to Germany.  Just before going he wrote:—­

’I am just discovering Thomas Hardy.  There are two methods of discovery.  One is when Columbus discovers America.  The other is when some one begins to read a famous author who has already run into seventy editions, and refuses to speak about anything else, and considers every one else who reads the author’s works his own special converts.  Mine is the second method.  I am more or less Hardy-drunk.’

The humorous exactness and detachment of the description are remarkable, and we feel that there was more than the supersession of a small by a great idol in this second phase.  By April he is at Jena, ’only 15 miles from Goethe’s grave, whose inhabitant has taken the place of Thomas Hardy (successor to Masefield) as my favourite prophet.’