The glorification of England!  There are some who would give their souls to be able to glorify her as she has been glorified, by Shakespeare, by Milton, by Wordsworth, and by Hardy.  For an Englishman there is no richer inspiration, no finer theme; to have one’s speech and thought saturated by the fragrance of this lovely and pleasant land was once the birthright of English poets and novelists.  But something has crept between us and it, dividing.  Instead of an instinctive love, there is a conscious desire of England; instead of slow saturation, a desperate plunge into its mystery.  The fragrance does not come at its own sweet will; we clutch at it.  It does not enfold and pervade our most arduous speculations; no involuntary sweetness comes flooding in upon our confrontation of human destinies.  Hardy is the last of that great line.  If we long for sweetness—­as we do long for it, and with how poignant a pain!—­we must seek it out, like men who rush dusty and irritable from the babble and fever of the town.  The rhythm of the earth never enters into their gait; they are like spies among the birds and flowers, like collectors of antique furniture in the haunts of peace.  The Georgians snatch at nature; they are never part of it.  And there is some element of this desperation in Mr Masefield.  We feel in him an anxiety to load every rift with ore of this particular kind, a deliberate intention to emphasise that which is most English in the English country-side.

How shall we say it?  It is not that he makes a parade of arcane knowledge.  The word ‘parade’ does injustice to his indubitable integrity.  But we seem to detect behind his superfluity of technical, and at times archaic phrase, an unconscious desire to convince himself that he is saturated in essential Englishness, and we incline to think that even his choice of an actual subject was less inevitable than self-imposed.  He would isolate the quality he would capture, have it more wholly within his grasp; yet, in some subtle way, it finally eludes him.  The intention is in excess, and in the manner of its execution everything is (though often very subtly) in excess also.  The music of English place-names, for instance is too insistent; no one into whom they had entered with the English air itself would use them with so manifest an admiration.

Perhaps a comparison may bring definition nearer.  The first part of Mr Masefield’s poem, which describes the meet and the assembled persons one by one, recalls, not merely by the general cast of the subject, but by many actual turns of phrase, Chaucer’s Prologue.  Mr Masefield’s parson has more than one point of resemblance to Chaucer’s Monk:—­

  ’An out-ryder, that loved venerye;
  A manly man to ben an abbot able....’

But it would take too long to quote both pictures.  We may choose for our juxtaposition the Prioress and one of Mr Masefield’s young ladies:—­