And if some accuse me of subserving the cause of Catholic reaction, others perhaps, the official Catholics....  But these, in Spain, trouble themselves little about anything, and are interested only in their own quarrels and dissensions.  And besides, poor folk, they have neither eyes nor ears!

But the truth is that my work—­I was going to say my mission—­is to shatter the faith of men here, there, and everywhere, faith in affirmation, faith in negation, and faith in abstention from faith, and this for the sake of faith in faith itself; it is to war against all those who submit, whether it be to Catholicism, or to rationalism, or to agnosticism; it is to make all men live the life of inquietude and passionate desire.

Will this work be efficacious?  But did Don Quixote believe in the immediate apparential efficacy of his work?  It is very doubtful, and at any rate he did not by any chance put his visor to the test by slashing it a second time.  And many passages in his history show that he did not look with much confidence to the immediate success of his design to restore knight-errantry.  And what did it matter to him so long as thus he lived and immortalized himself?  And he must have surmised, and did in fact surmise, that his work would have another and higher efficacy, and that was that it would ferment in the minds of all those who in a pious spirit read of his exploits.

Don Quixote made himself ridiculous; but did he know the most tragic ridicule of all, the inward ridicule, the ridiculousness of a man’s self to himself, in the eyes of his own soul?  Imagine Don Quixote’s battlefield to be his own soul; imagine him to be fighting in his soul to save the Middle Ages from the Renaissance, to preserve the treasure of his infancy; imagine him an inward Don Quixote, with a Sancho, at his side, inward and heroical too—­and tell me if you find anything comic in the tragedy.

And what has Don Quixote left, do you ask?  I answer, he has left himself, and a man, a living and eternal man, is worth all theories and all philosophies.  Other peoples have left chiefly institutions, books; we have left souls; St. Teresa is worth any institution, any Critique of Pure Reason.

But Don Quixote was converted.  Yes—­and died, poor soul.  But the other, the real Don Quixote, he who remained on earth and lives amongst us, animating us with his spirit—­this Don Quixote was not converted, this Don Quixote continues to incite us to make ourselves ridiculous, this Don Quixote must never die.  And the conversion of the other Don Quixote—­he who was converted only to die—­was possible because he was mad, and it was his madness, and not his death nor his conversion that immortalized him, earning him forgiveness for the crime of having been born.[67] Felix culpa! And neither was his madness cured, but only transformed.  His death was his last knightly adventure; in dying he stormed heaven, which suffereth violence.