“7.  Liberal provision was to be made for the Hebrew servant at the termination of his servitude.  During his term of service, he was to be regarded and treated ‘as an hired servant and a sojourner.’

“8.  Bondmen and bondmaids, as property, without limitation of time, and transmissible as inheritance to children, might be bought of surrounding nations.  The children of sojourners also could be thus acquired.  To these the seventh year’s and the fiftieth year’s release did not apply.

“Now, Mr. North,” said I, “let me proceed to try your faith somewhat.  I will see whether your confidence in divine revelation is sound, for nothing at the present day has overthrown the faith of many like the manifest teachings of the Bible with regard to slavery.  You have felt that the Hebrew code is better than ours, so far as it relates to slaves who were Hebrews.  As to the slaves from the heathen, we infer that they met ‘with rigor,’ or at least were liable to it; for God continually enjoins it upon the Hebrews that they shall not use rigor with their brethren.

“Now let me mention some things which will try your faith in revelation, if you are an abolitionist.

“The Hebrews were allowed to sell their servants to other people.

“Thus they traded in flesh and blood.  This was prohibited in the case of a Hebrew maid-servant, whom a man had bought and had made her his concubine.  If she did not please him, it was said that—­’to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power.’  The inference is that they sold their Gentile slaves, if they pleased, ‘to a strange nation.’  Again.  When a father or mother became poor, their creditor could take their children for servants.  Thus you read:  ’Now there cried a certain woman of the wives of the sons of the prophets unto Elisha saying, Thy servant my husband is dead, and thou knowest that thy servant did fear the Lord; and the creditor is come to take unto him my two sons to be bondmen.’  This was according to the law of Moses, in the twenty-fifth of Leviticus; ‘bondmen,’ however, meaning here a servant for a term of years.  See also the New Testament parable of the unforgiving servant.

“This was hard, it will seem to you and to all of us, that if one became poor in Israel, his children could be attached.  Thus the idea of involuntary servitude, where no crime was, prevailed in the Theocracy.

“But we come now to something which draws harder upon our faith.

“We find the Most High prescribing, Exodus xxi. 20, 21, that a master who kills his servant under chastisement shall be punished (but not put to death); and if the servant survives a day or two, the master shall not even be ‘punished’ for the death of his slave!

“The reason which the Most High gives is this:  ‘For he is his money’!