was so preposterous that he would be an infidel, nay,
he would go farther, he would be an atheist, rather
than believe it. Our moral instincts are our
guide. They are the highest source of evidence
that there is a God, and they are a perfect indication
as to what God and his requirements should be.
He was for passing a vote of disapprobation at the
act of Paul the Apostle in sending back Onesimus into
bondage. Tell me not, said he, that the Apostle
calls him ’a brother beloved,’ and ‘one
of you;’ these honeyed phrases are but coatings
to a deadly poison. Slavery is evil, and only
evil and that continually. Disguise it as you
will, Philemon holds property in Onesimus. By
the laws of Phrygia, he could put Onesimus to death
for running away. He deplored the act as a heavy
blow at Christianity. It would countervail the
teachings of the Apostle. He sincerely hoped that
the Epistle to Philemon would not be preserved; for
should it be collected hereafter, as possibly it may,
among Paul’s letters, unborn ages might make
it an apology for slavery, it would abate the hatred
of the world against the sum of all villanies.
He would even be in favor of a vote requesting Philemon
to give Onesimus his liberty at once, even without
his consent, sending him back, with this most unwise
and unblest epistle to Philemon, to Paul, who says
that he ’would have retained him,’ but
would not without Philemon’s consent. He
did hope that the brethren would speak their minds,
be open-mouthed, and not be like dumb dogs. For
his part he wanted an anti-slavery religion. He
acknowledged that the truths of the Gospel needed
the stimulant of freedom to give them life and power.
“His remarks evidently produced a great sensation,
for a variety of reasons, as we may well suppose.
“A man took the floor in opposition to this
Laodicean brother. He was a Jewish convert, a
member of the Colossian Church. His name was
Theodotus. Born a Jew, he had renounced his religion
and became a Greek Sophist, practised law at Scio,
and heard Paul at Mars Hill, where, with Dionysius
the Areopagite, with whom he was visiting, he was converted.
He had established himself at Colosse, in the practice
of law. He was unusually tall for a man of his
descent, had beautifully regular Jewish features,
and was a captivating speaker.
“He said that they had ’heard strange
things to-day. If they are true, we have no foundation
underneath our feet. Every man’s moral sentiments,
it seems, are to be his guide. Where, then, is
our common appeal? For his part he believed that
if God be our heavenly Father, he has given his children
an authentic book, a writing, for their guide, unless
he prefers to speak personally with them, or with
their representatives. When he ceased to speak
by the prophets, he spoke to us by his Son; and now
that his Son is ascended, I believe,’ said he,
’that inspired men are appointed to guide us,
and seeing that they cannot reach all by their living