in the metropolis. For instance, at the entrance
of each lodging, and of almost every private house,
there sits a being termed a
concierge, who
knows the hour at which each inmate enters and goes
out; who calls on him; how many letters he receives;
by their post-marks, where they come from; what parcels
are left for him; what they appear to contain, &c.
&c. &c. Again, at the corner of every principal
street, there is located, wearing the badge of the
police, a commissionaire, acquainted with all that
outwardly goes on within the radius of his Argus-eyed
observations. From these people, from the drivers
of fiacres, from the sellers of vegetables, from fruiterers,
and lastly, from the masters of wine-shops, who either
from people sober, tipsy, or drunk, are in the habit
of hearing an infinity of garrulous details, the police
are enabled to track the conduct of almost any one,
and, if necessary, to follow up their suspicions by
their own agents in disguises which, practically speaking,
render them invisible.’ Sir Francis mentions
that he was considered of sufficient importance to
be under surveillance. ’"You are,” said
very gravely to me a gentleman in Paris of high station,
on whom I had had occasion to call, “a person
of some consideration. Your object here is not
understood, and you are therefore under the surveillance
of the police.” I asked him what that meant.
“Wherever you go,” he replied, “you
are followed by an agent of police. When one is
tired, he hands you over to another. Whatever
you do, is known to them; and at this moment there
is one waiting in the street until you leave me."’
We need say no more. The people who, under all
phases of government—despotism, constitutional
monarchy, and universal-suffrage republic—coolly
tolerate, nay, they admire and vindicate, this atrocious
system of personal restraint and espionage, are totally
unfit for the enjoyment of civil liberty. In conclusion,
we can hardly recommend the book before us, further
than to say, that its gossip, though often prosy to
the verge of twaddle, is also sometimes droll and
amusing from its graphic minuteness.
* * * *
*
[Footnote 2: A Faggot of French Sticks,
2 vols. London: Murray. 1852.]
IVORY AND ITS APPLICATIONS.
The Chinese, from time immemorial, have been celebrated
for their excellence in the fabrication of ornamental
articles in ivory; and, strange to say, up to our
own time, their productions are still unrivalled.
European artists have never succeeded in cutting ivory
after the manner of these people, nor, to all appearance,
is it likely they ever will. Nothing can be more
exquisitely beautiful than the delicate lacework of
a Chinese fan, or the elaborate carving of their miniature
junks, chess-pieces, and concentric balls: their
models of temples, pagodas, and other pieces of architecture
are likewise skilfully constructed; and yet three
thousand years ago such monuments of art were executed
with the very same grace and fidelity!